English

中国农机化学报

中国农机化学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (8): 162-169.DOI: 10.13733/j.jcam.issn.2095‑5553.2024.08.024

• 农业信息化工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于可见/近红外高光谱成像技术的梨树叶部病害识别研究

潘健1,2,祁雁楠2,3,陈鲁威2,夏烨2,吕晓兰1,2,3   

  • 出版日期:2024-08-15 发布日期:2024-07-26
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2022YFD2001400);国家农业重大技术攻关专项(NK2022160104);国家现代农业产业技术体系:国家梨产业技术体系(CARS—28—21)

Study on identification of pear leaf disease based on hyperspectral imaging technology

Pan Jian1, 2, Qi Yannan2, 3, Chen Luwei2, Xia Ye2, Lü  Xiaolan1, 2, 3   

  • Online:2024-08-15 Published:2024-07-26

摘要: 梨树生长期内伴随着病害发生,喷施农药是病害防治的主要措施,而病害识别则是保证精准施药的基本要求。为实现梨树叶部病害的高效识别,提出基于可见/近红外高光谱成像技术结合机器学习对梨树病叶进行分类检测的方法。利用近地面成像高光谱仪在自然光条件下采集健康叶、褐斑病、黑斑病及日灼病四类样本的高光谱图像,提取401~935 nm波段间感兴趣区域的平均光谱数据,对比分析Savitzky⁃Golay卷积平滑(SG)、标准正态变换(SNV)、SG结合一阶微分和SG结合二阶微分4种预处理算法全波段模型效果,对最佳预处理方法后的数据采用主成分分析法(PCA)和连续投影算法(SPA)进行特征波长提取,建立优化的支持向量机(SVM)和误差反馈神经网络(BPNN)判别模型,并对模型分类性能进行比较,最终优选出适合梨树病害的最佳分类判别模型。研究结果表明,全光谱数据在SNV预处理后识别效果最好,通过PCA和SPA算法分别提取出12、14个特征波长,波长数目减少90%以上,且SPA算法相较于PCA算法在SVM和BPNN模型中表现均更优。经对比发现,梨树病害的最佳判别分类模型为SNV-SPA-SVM,结合混淆矩阵得出该模型测试集总体准确率达93.57%,对各类样本的分类准确率均达到90%,Kappa系数为0.916 5。利用可见/近红外高光谱技术能够有效分类识别梨树叶部病害,为实现田间梨树叶片病害的自动诊断提供新方法。

关键词: 梨树病害, 高光谱成像, 特征波长, 判别模型, 机器学习

Abstract: Pear trees are affected by diseases during the growing season, and pesticide spraying is the main measure for disease control, while disease identification is a prerequisite to ensure accurate application. A method based on visible/NIR hyperspectral imaging combined with machine learning for the classification and detection of pear leaf diseases is proposed to achieve efficient identification of pear leaf diseases. Hyperspectral images of four types of samples, namely, healthy leaves, brown spots, black spots and sunburn disease, were collected under natural light conditions using a ground‑based hyperspectral imaging system. The average spectral data of the region of interest between 401 and 935 nm band were extracted to compare and analyse four types of Savitzky‑Golay smoothing (SG), standard normal transform (SNV), SG combined with first‑order differentiation and SG combined with second‑order differentiation. The results were compared, and finally the best classification and discrimination model for pear diseases was selected by using principal component analysis (PCA) and continuous projection algorithm (SPA). The results showed that the full‑spectrum data were best identified after the SNV pre‑processing, and the feature wavelengths extracted by the SPA algorithm performed better in both the SVM and BPNN models compared to the PCA algorithm. The best discriminative classification model for pear diseases was found to be SNV-SPA-SVM. The overall accuracy was 93.57% and the Kappa coefficient was 0.916 5. The use of visible/NIR hyperspectral technology can effectively classify and identify pear leaf diseases, providing a new method to achieve automatic diagnosis of pear leaf diseases in the field.

Key words: pear diseases, hyperspectral imaging, feature wavelengths, calibration models, machine learning

中图分类号: