English

中国农机化学报

中国农机化学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (11): 231-238.DOI: 10.13733/j.jcam.issn.2095-5553.2022.11.032

• 农业机械化综合研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

农村人居环境整治农户满意度影响因素与多元实现路径——基于模糊集定性比较分析

朱文韬1, 2,栾敬东1   

  1. 1. 安徽农业大学经济管理学院,合肥市,230036; 2. 皖西学院金融与数学学院,安徽六安,237012
  • 出版日期:2022-11-15 发布日期:2022-10-25
  • 基金资助:
    中国工程院院地合作项目(2021—7);安徽农业大学2021年乡村振兴研究中心招标课题(2021—1);安徽省农业农村厅招标课题(皖农科函[2021]711号)

Influencing factors and multiple realization paths of farmers satisfaction with the improvement of rural living environment: Based on FSQCA method

Zhu Wenzhao, Luan Jingdong.   

  • Online:2022-11-15 Published:2022-10-25

摘要: 为探索影响农村人居环境整治农户满意度诸因素的混合效应及满意度提高的多元实现路径,提出一种基于模糊集定性比较分析方法(fsQCA)。以安徽省16市48个村庄为例,在现有文献梳理的基础上,应用模糊集定性比较分析方法(fsQCA)探索农村人居环境整治规划、生产性废弃物污染防治、生活垃圾与污水处理、村容村貌提升工作、基础设施建设等5个方面的前因因素对人居环境整治农户满意度的混合影响效应,得到4个前因组态。研究发现,所有单个条件变量并非影响农村人居环境整治农户满意度的必要条件,4个前因组态均不包括“农村生产性废弃物污染防治”。研究提出,农村人居环境整治农户满意度提高的4条实现路径,即“环境整治规划型路径”、“政府主导农户协作型路径”、“政府主导型路径”和“政府农户通力合作型路径”。最后,从科学规划,扎实推进人居环境整治工作、加大投入,加快基础设施建设,补齐环境整治短板、赢得农户信任,争取农户主动参与人居环境整治工作等三方面给出提高农村人居环境整治农户满意度的政策建议。

关键词: 农村人居环境, 环境整治, 农户满意度, 模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA), 组态, 路径

Abstract: A qualitative comparative analysis method based on fuzzy set (fsQCA) was proposed to explore the mixed effects of the factors affecting farmers satisfaction with the improvement of rural human living environment and the multiple realization path of satisfaction improvement. Taking 48 villages in 16 cities in Anhui province as an example, the paper, on the basis of the existing literature, used the fuzzy set/qualitative comparative analysis method (fsQCA) to explore the mixed effects of five antecedent factors in rural living environment remediation planning, productive waste pollution prevention and control, domestic garbage and sewage treatment, village appearance improvement work and infrastructure construction on farmers satisfaction with the improvement of living environment, and get four antecedent configurations. It was found that all single condition variables were not necessary to affect farmers satisfaction with the improvement of living environment, and the four antecedent configurations didnt include ‘productive waste pollution prevention and control’. According to the research, there were four ways to realize the improvement of farmers satisfaction with the improvement of living environment, namely ‘Environmental remediation planning path’, ‘Governmentled collaborative path for farmers’, ‘Governmentled path’ and ‘Governmentfarmer collaborative approach’. Finally, the paper gave some policy suggestions to improve the farmers satisfaction of rural living environment remediation from such three aspects as scientific planning to solidly promote the living environment remediation work, increasing the investment and speeding up the infrastructure construction to make up for the shortcomings of environmental remediation and winning the trust of farmers to strive for the initiative participation of farmers in living environment remediation work.

Key words: rural living environment, environmental remediation, farmers satisfaction, fuzzy set/qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), configuration, path

中图分类号: