干旱区新型农业经营主体与农户利益联结模式效果评价研究

doi:10.13733/j.jcam.issn.2095-5553.2024.05.047

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究干旱区新型农业经营主体与农户利益联结模式效果，有利于促进农户收入的增加、小农户与现代农业的有机衔接，并进一步发挥其带动作用。从经营效果、治理效果、发展效果维度构建利益联结模式效果评价指标体系，运用主客观分析法确定指标综合权重，通过TOPSIS法，对干旱区最常见的股份式或股份合作式、企业化式、订单合同式利益联结模式作实证分析，同时利用障碍因子诊断模型，探讨利益联结模式效果的主要影响因子。结果显示，股份式或股份合作式的贴近度最大，为0.678，企业化式的贴近度次之，为0.640，订单合同式的贴近度最低，为0.253。从准则层权重来看，经营效果权重较大，治理效果、发展效果的权重相当。培训情况、农业收入增长率、二次分红、机械化水平、覆盖农户数、产业融合程度是影响利益联结模式效果的重要因素。鉴于此，提出干旱区政府应加大股份式或股份合作式的利益联结机制的推行力度，提高农户的成长能力，增强经营主体的盈利能力等对策建议。

关键词: 干旱区, 新型农业经营主体, 利益联结, AHP-熵权法, TOPSIS法, 障碍度诊断模型

Abstract: The study of the effect of the interest connection mode between new agricultural business subjects and farmers in arid areas is conducive to promoting the increase of farmers income and the organic connection between small farmers and modern agriculture, and further playing its driving role. The effect evaluation index system of the benefit linkage model is constructed from the dimensions of operation effect, governance effect and development effect, and the comprehensive weight of the index is determined by the subjective and objective analysis methods. Through the TOPSIS method, this paper conducts an empirical analysis on the most common jointstock or jointstock cooperative, enterprisebased, and ordercontract benefitlinking modes in arid areas. At the same time, the obstacle factor diagnosis model is used to explore the main influencing factors of the effect of the interest linkage mode. The results show that the closeness degree of the shareholding type or shareholding cooperation type is the largest, which is 0.678, the closeness degree of the enterprise type is the second, which is 0.640, and the closeness degree of the order contract type is the lowest, which is 0.253. From the perspective of the weight of the standard layer, the weight of the management effect is larger, and the weight of the governance effect and the development effect is equal. The training situation, agricultural income growth rate, secondary dividends, mechanization level, the number of farmers covered, and the degree of industrial integration are important factors that affect the effect of the benefit linkage model. In view of this, it is suggested that the government in the arid areas should strengthen the implementation of the jointstock or jointstock cooperative interest connection mechanism, improve the growth ability of farmers, and enhance the profitability of the operating subjects.

Key words: , arid areas, new agricultural management entities, interest linkage, AHPEntropy weight method, TOPSIS method, obstacle diagnosis model

中图分类号:

何舒婉, 朱美玲. 干旱区新型农业经营主体与农户利益联结模式效果评价研究[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2024, 45(5): 329-336.

He Shuwan, Zhu Meilin.. Study on the effect evaluation of the new model of interest linkage between agricultural management entities and farmers in arid areas[J]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2024, 45(5): 329-336.

参考文献

［1］　贺敏. 新型农业经营主体与小农户利益联结问题研究［J］. 农业经济, 2020(10): 15-17.
［2］　姜长云. 新时代创新完善农户利益联结机制研究［J］. 社会科学战线, 2019(7): 44-53.
［3］　李凤梅. 土地承包经营权流转双方的合作共赢之道——可持续生计理论框架下的博弈［J］. 中共福建省委党校学报, 2017(3): 77-84.
［4］　高宇. 我国农村土地流转机制研究［J］. 科技情报开发与经济, 2012, 22(6): 130-132.Gao Yu. Research on rural land transfer mechanism in China ［J］. Science and Technology Information Development and Economy, 2012, 22(6): 130-132.
［5］　郑小妮. 农业产业化利益机制几种主要模式的探究［J］. 知识经济, 2016(5): 24.
［6］　李和平, 张晓晓. 农户视角下现代农业产业园利益联结机制探析［J］. 农村经济, 2019(7): 119-126.
［7］　叶磊磊. 农村产业融合视角下龙头企业和农户利益联结机制的研究［D］. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2020.Ye Leilei. Research on the linking mechanism of interests between leading enterprises and farm households from the perspective of rural industry integration ［D］. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2020.
［8］　姜长云. 完善农村一二三产业融合发展的利益联结机制要拓宽视野［J］. 中国发展观察, 2016(2): 42-43, 45.
［9］　陈东平, 宋文华. 农民与新型农业经营主体利益联结稳定性: 信任的作用——基于多个案例的分析［J］. 农村经济, 2018(3): 99-105.
［10］　钱淼, 马龙波. 合作社为枢纽的农企利益联结机制研究——以山东省院东头镇茶产业为例［J］. 林业经济, 2018, 40(1): 87-91.
Qian Miao, Ma Longbo. Study on the profit joint mechanism of peasants and leading enterprises coupled with cooperatives: A case study of tea industry in Yuandongtou Town in Shandong Province ［J］. Forestry Economy, 2018, 40(1): 87-91.
［11］　肖湘湘, 许丽娟, 陈泉. “企业+合作社+农户”扶贫模式的创新实践研究——以L集团油茶产业为例［J］. 中国商论, 2020(18): 183-185.
［12］　于凡. 农业小微企业与农户联结机制分析——以吉林省为例［J］. 农业经济, 2018(8): 80-82.
［13］　唐微. 现代农业经营体系利益联结机制构建［J］. 农业经济, 2020(4): 12-14.
［14］　阮荣平, 曹冰雪, 周佩, 等. 新型农业经营主体辐射带动能力及影响因素分析——基于全国2615家新型农业经营主体的调查数据［J］. 中国农村经济, 2017(11): 17-32.
Ruan Rongping, Cao Bingxue, Zhou Pei, et al. The driving capacity of new agricultural management entities and its determinants: An analysis based on data from 2615 new agricultural management entities in China ［J］. Rural Economy in China, 2017(11): 17-32.
［15］　兰勇, 周艺珮, 蒋黾. 家庭农场与农业企业利益联结机制综合评价研究［J］. 农业现代化研究, 2021, 42(5): 805-814.
Lan Yong, Zhou Yipei, Jiang Min. The comprehensive evaluation of the benefit linkage mechanism between family farms and agricultural enterprises ［J］. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2021, 42(5): 805-814.
［16］　Salas P C. Relational contracts and product quality: The effect of bargaining power on efficiency and distribution ［J］. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2016, 41(3): 406-424.
［17］　黄梦思, 孙剑. 复合治理“挤出效应”对农产品营销渠道绩效的影响——以“农业龙头企业+农户”模式为例［J］. 中国农村经济, 2016(4): 17-30, 54.
［18］　舒学兵. 荆州市家庭农场经营效率及其影响因素研究［D］. 重庆: 西南大学, 2015.Shu Xuebing. Operational efficiency and its influencing factors research on the family farms in Jingzhou City ［D］. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2015.
［19］　蒲春玲, 刘志有, 胡赛, 等. 西部“矿农复合区”非自愿移民搬迁障碍因子研究——基于新疆典型县市的调查分析［J］. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(1): 64-68.
Pu Chunling, Liu Zhiyou, Hu Sai, et al. Relocation obstacle factors for involuntary migrants in mining and agriculture area of the west region and the regulatory mechanism ［J］. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2017, 31(1): 64-68.
［20］　杨凡雨, 邱孟龙, 刘黎明. 耕地质量管理绩效评价及障碍因子诊断——以陕西彬州市义门镇为例［J］. 农业现代化研究, 2020, 41(4): 699-708.
Yang Fanyu, Qiu Menglong, Liu Liming. The performance evaluation of farmland quality management and the diagnosis of obstacles: A case study of Yimen Town, Binzhou City, Shaanxi Province ［J］. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2020, 41(4): 699-708.
［21］　黄河东. 基于PSR模型和改进TOPSIS法的中国城市群生态质量比较研究［J］. 生态经济, 2016, 32(6): 164-167, 200.Huang Hedong. The comparative studies on the ecological quality of Chinas city agglomeration based on the PSR model and the improved TOPSIS method ［J］. Ecological Economy, 2016, 32(6): 164-167, 200.

[1]	陈楠, Abilimi Essossinam Cyrille, 杨春慧. 农业生产性服务业与新型农业经营主体耦合协调关系的实证研究——以吉林省为例[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2024, 45(5): 289-298.
[2]	王剑, 刘瑞峰, 梁飞, 李幸子, 马恒运. 小农户与新型农业经营主体有机衔接意愿研究——以河南省林州市为例[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2024, 45(5): 299-309.
[3]	张建杰, 卢紫冰. 我国家庭农场的研究进展——基于CiteSpace的可视化分析[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2024, 45(2): 303-310.
[4]	孜尼哈尔·祖努尼江, , 尼加提·卡斯木, , 拓跋凯薇. 基于FOD-ML的干旱区土壤有机质含量估算[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2023, 44(11): 201-209.
[5]	何正燕, 张艳荣. 甘肃省农业农村现代化发展水平测度及障碍因子研究[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2022, 43(2): 229-.
[6]	张晓雷, 闫述乾, 李之凤. 欠发达地区农民专业合作社联合社绩效评价——基于组合赋权TOPSIS法[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2022, 43(1): 228-236.
[7]	许晓冬;刘金晶;. 基于时空维度的东北三省农业现代化水平评价研究[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2021, 42(5): 129-138.
[8]	孙竹梅;刘同山;孙东宝;刘兵林;倪玉君;. 农业产业数字化转型的难点及对策分析——基于枣庄市143家新型农业经营主体的调研[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2021, 42(3): 122-128.
[9]	刘七军;韦孟丹;李昭楠;胡垚坤;. 典型深度贫困区农户脆弱性测度及其差异性研究——基于内陆干旱区微观调查数据[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2020, 41(7): 215-223.
[10]	席飞扬;刘晓玲;郭丽;张蕴涵;刘晓明;. 乡村振兴战略下我国农机互助保险的发展对策研究[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2020, 41(4): 229-236.
[11]	张梅;王晓;. 精准扶贫中农民合作社扶贫模式研究[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2019, 40(6): 209-214.
[12]	王扬光;高东明;叶宗照;赵作伟;. 我国农机合作社规范化建设影响因素研究[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2019, 40(12): 196-199+211.
[13]	赵华洋;李长河;李理;刘光宇;何智彪;赵桂芝;. 基于熵权TOPSIS法的蓖麻联合收割机选型评价研究[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2019, 40(1): 174-178.