Study on farmers' willingness to participate in non‑point source pollution control of cultivated land from the perspective of psychological inertia: A case study of organic fertilizer application

doi:10.13733/j.jcam.issn.2095‑5553.2024.08.040

Abstract

Abstract: In order to investigate the willingness of farmers to participate in the control of non‑point source pollution of cultivated land and promote the green transformation of agriculture, based on 507 field survey data in Zhumadian City, Henan Province, the ELM theory and psychological inertia were used to construct a model of influencing factors of farmers' willingness to apply organic fertilizer, and the differences in information processing among farmers with different adjustment orientation characteristics were also considered. The results showed that both the central path and the edge path had significant effects on the information processing of farmers' perceived value, with the order of price value (0.292) > opinion leader (0.278) > comment valence (0.237) > product utility (2.137). In general, farmers' perceived value of organic fertilizer was more affected by the edge path. Value perception (0.536) significantly affected farmers' intention to apply organic fertilizer. Psychological inertia (-0.074) weakened the effect between perceived value and willingness to apply organic fertilizer. Promoting oriented (0.114) trait farmers strengthened the role between comment titer and perceived value. In order to promote farmers to actively participate in the control of non‑point source pollution of cultivated land, we should improve the subsidy policy of organic fertilizer, give play to the guiding role of opinion leaders, and strengthen the promotion of the effect of organic fertilizer application.

Key words: farmland non?point source pollution, willingness to participate, organic fertilizer, ELM, psychological inertia

摘要： 为考察农户参与耕地面源污染治理意愿，促进农业绿色转型，基于河南省驻马店市507份实地调研数据，运用ELM理论，结合心理惯性，构建农户施用有机肥意愿影响因素模型，同时考虑具有不同调节定向特质的农户对信息加工的差异。结果表明：中心路径和边缘路径对农户感知价值的信息加工均有显著影响，影响大小为价格价值（0.292）、意见领袖（0.278）、评论效价（0.237）、产品效用（2.137）。总的来看，农户有机肥价值感知受边缘路径的影响作用更大；感知价值（0.536）显著影响农户的有机肥施用意愿；心理惯性（-0.074）削弱了感知价值与施用有机肥意愿之间的影响；促进定向（0.114）特质农户强化了评论效价与感知价值之间的作用。为推动农户积极参与耕地面源污染治理应从完善有机肥补贴政策、发挥意见领袖引导作用、加强有机肥施用效果推广等方面考量。

关键词: 耕地面源污染, 参与意愿, 有机肥, ELM, 心理惯性

CLC Number:

Liu Jing, Ma Tengfei, Li Jing, Tang Xiaoqing. Study on farmers' willingness to participate in non‑point source pollution control of cultivated land from the perspective of psychological inertia: A case study of organic fertilizer application [J]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2024, 45(8): 276-283.

刘晶, 马腾飞, 李静, 唐小清. 心理惯性视角下农户参与耕地面源污染治理意愿研究——以施用有机肥为例[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2024, 45(8): 276-283.

References

[ 1 ] 中国政府网《农业面源污染治理与监督指导实施方案（试行）》[EB/OL]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk15/202103/t20210326_826212.html， 2021-03-26.
[ 2 ] 中国政府网《“十四五”推进农业农村现代化规划》[EB/OL]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2022-02/11/content_5673082.htm， 2022-02-11.
[ 3 ] 杨世琦. 基于国家粮食安全下的农业面源污染综合防治体系思考[J]. 中国农业科学， 2022， 55（17）: 3380-3394.
Yang Shiqi. Thought of pollution comprehensive prevention and control system of non‑point sources based on national food security [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica， 2022， 55（17）: 3380-3394.
[ 4 ] 宋家永，李英涛，宋宇，等. 农业面源污染的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报， 2010， 26（11）: 362-365.
Song Jiayong， Li Yingtao， Song Yu， et al. Research and prospect on non‑point pollution from agriculture [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin， 2010， 26（11）: 362-365.
[ 5 ] 周志波. 环境税规制农业面源污染的政治经济学研究[J]. 江西财经大学学报， 2022（5）: 89-102.
Zhou Zhibo. A political economic research on environmental tax regulating agricultural non‑point source pollution [J]. Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics， 2022（5）: 89-102.
[ 6 ] 赵健，籍瑶，刘玥，等. 长江流域农业面源污染现状、问题与对策[J]. 环境保护， 2022， 50（17）: 30-32.
Zhao Jian， Ji Yao， Liu Yue， et al. Current situation， problems and suggestions on agricultural non‑point source pollution in the Yangtze River Basin [J]. Environmental Protection， 2022， 50（17）: 30-32.
[ 7 ] 沈贵银，孟祥海. 农业面源污染治理: 政策实践、面临挑战与多元主体合作共治[J]. 云南民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）， 2022， 39（1）: 58-64.
Shen Guiyin， Meng Xianghai. Policy practice， challenges and multi‑agent cooperation and co‑governance in the agricultural non‑point source pollution control [J]. Journal of Yunnan Minzu University （Social Sciences）， 2022， 39（1）: 58-64.
[ 8 ] 周慧，文高辉，胡贤辉. 基于TPB框架的心理认知对农户农业面源污染治理参与意愿的影响——兼论环境规制的调节效应[J]. 世界农业， 2021（3）: 59-69.
[ 9 ] 赵领娣，赵志博，李莎莎. 白洋淀农业面源污染治理分析——基于政府与农户演化博弈模型[J]. 北京理工大学学报（社会科学版）， 2020， 22（3）: 48-56.
Zhao Lingdi， Zhao Zhibo， Li Shasha. Analysis of agricultural non‑point source pollution control in Baiyangdian: Based on evolutionary game model between government and farmers [J]. Journal of Beijing institute of technology （Social Sciences Edition）， 2020， 22（3）: 48-56.
[10] 卿漪，龙方. 农民参与农业面源污染治理的意愿及其影响因素——基于洞庭湖区“清洁田园”行动的经验分析[J]. 湖南农业大学学报（社会科学版）， 2018， 19（4）: 47-52， 72.
Qing Yi， Long Fang. Intentions and its influence factors of farmers participation in agricultural non‑point source pollution control: Based on the empirical analysis of the “clean countryside” action in the Dongting Lake district [J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University （Social Sciences）， 2018， 19（4）: 47-52， 72.
[11] 胡梦雅，孙彦，曹天庆，等. 耕地面源污染治理农户参与意愿研究[J]. 水土保持研究， 2021， 28（4）: 397-403.
Hu Mengya， Sun Yan， Cao Tianqing， et al. Research on farmers' willingness to participate in non‑point source pollution control of cultivated land [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation， 2021， 28（4）: 397-403.
[12] Bhattacherjee A， Sanford C. Influence processes for information technology acceptance: An elaboration likelihood model [J]. MIS Quarterly， 2006， 30（4）: 805-825.
[13] Yu L， Li H， He W， et al. A meta‑analysis to explore privacy cognition and information disclosure of internet users [J]. International Journal of Information Management， 2019， 51.
[14] Yan B， Jian L. Beyond reciprocity: The bystander effect of knowledge response in online knowledge communities [J]. Computers in Human Behavior， 2017， 76: 9-18.
[15] 李武，许耀心，丛挺. 在线付费问答平台用户感知价值对付费意愿的影响——基于过去行为的调节效应分析[J]. 新闻界， 2018（10）: 92-100.
[16] 张颖，朱庆华. 付费知识问答社区中提问者的答主选择行为研究[J]. 情报理论与实践， 2018， 41（12）: 21-26.
Zhang Ying， Zhu Qinghua. Answerer selection behavior of questioner in paid knowledge Q & A community [J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application， 2018， 41（12）: 21-26.
[17] Merriam‑Webster I. Merriam‑webster's collegiate dicitionary [M]. Springfield， Massachusetts: Merriam‑Webster， 2004.
[18] 胡珍苗，程岩，崔华玉. 在线内容用户服务升级意愿研究: 基于增值体验的心理惯性视角[J]. 管理评论， 2016， 28（11）: 116-128.
Hu Zhenmiao， Cheng Yan， Cui Huayu. What converts online content consumers from free to fee: Perspective from mental inertia based on value‑added experience [J]. Management Review， 2016， 28（11）: 116-128.
[19] Polites G L， Karahanna E. Shackled to the status quo: The inhibiting effects of incumbent system habit， switching costs， and inertia on new system acceptance [J]. MIS Quarterly， 2012， 36（1）: 21-42.
[20] Rumelt R P. Inertia and transformation [J]. Springer US， 1995.
[21] Higgins E T. Beyond pleasure and pain: How motivation works [M]. Oxford University Press， 2012.
[22] 沈旺，高雪倩，代旺，等. 基于解释水平理论与调节定向理论的社交网络隐私悖论研究[J]. 情报科学， 2020， 38（8）: 120-127， 140.
Shen Wang， Gao Xueqian， Dai Wang， et al. Research on social network privacy paradox based on construal level theory and regulation focus theory [J]. Information Science， 2020， 38（8）: 120-127， 140.
[23] 李大林，余伟萍. 消费者绿色购买意向的形成机制研究——广告目标框架和调节定向的作用[J]. 南京工业大学学报（社会科学版）， 2021， 20（1）: 87-98， 112.
Li Dalin， Yu Weiping. Research of the formation mechanism of consumers' green purchase intention: A role of advertising goal framing and regulatory focus [J]. Journal of Nanjing Tech University （Social Science Edition）， 2021， 20（1）: 87-98， 112.
[24] 费红梅，孙铭韩，王立. 农户黑土地保护性耕作行为决策: 价值感知抑或政策驱动?[J]. 自然资源学报， 2022， 37（9）: 2218-2230.
Fei Hongmei， Sun Minghan， Wang Li. Decision making of farmers' black land conservation tillage behavior: Value perception or policy driving? [J]. Journal of Natural Resources， 2022， 37（9）: 2218-2230.
[25] 任重，郭焱. 价值感知、社会资本对农户秸秆还田技术采纳行为的影响[J]. 江西财经大学学报， 2022（4）: 97-107.
Ren Zhong， Guo Yan. The influence of value perception and social capital on farmers' adoption of the straw‑returning‑to‑field technology [J]. Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics， 2022（4）: 97-107.
[26] 赵蕾. 基于社会认知和感知价值的生鲜农产品网购意愿影响因素研究[J]. 四川农业大学学报， 2022， 40（1）: 137-144.
Zhao Lei. Research on influence factors of online purchase intention toward fresh agricultural products based on social cognition and perceived value [J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University， 2022， 40（1）: 137-144.
[27] 袁湘玲. 卷入度、感知价值与顾客消费意向: 考虑价格框架的调节效应[J]. 商业经济研究， 2022（19）: 40-44.
[28] 张喜乐，毛军权. 在线评论对消费者购买意愿的影响——基于感知价值的调节作用[J]. 经济研究导刊， 2022（7）: 154-158.
[29] 林春培，潘亚丽，赵冠希，等. 组织心理惯性对企业破坏性创新的影响[J]. 科技进步与对策， 2019， 36（23）: 103-110.
Lin Chunpei， Pan Yali， Zhao Guanxi， et al. The impact of organizational psychological inertia on disruptive innovation [J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy， 2019， 36（23）: 103-110.
[30] 孙瑾，苗盼. 口碑效价因人而异: 调节定向与社会距离对消费者口碑效价的影响[J]. 南开管理评论， 2021， 24（5）: 202-214.
Sun Jin， Miao Pan. Does individual difference in word‑of‑mouth valence exist? Impact of regulatory focus and social distance on consumers' word‑of‑mouth valence [J]. Nankai Business Review， 2021， 24（5）: 202-214.
[31] 姚琦，乐国安，伍承聪，等. 调节定向的测量维度及其问卷的信度和效度检验[J]. 应用心理学， 2008， 14（4）: 318-323.
[32] 彭舜磊，李鹏，王梓臣，等. 河南省农业面源污染负荷估算及区划[J]. 水土保持研究， 2018， 25（1）: 225-230.
Peng Shunlei， Li Peng， Wang Zichen， et al. Calculations and regionalization of agricultural non‑point source pollution load in Henan Province [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation， 2018， 25（1）: 225-230.

[1]	Hao Yanjie, Liu Shuze, Wang Ziqiang, Wang Pengjun, Dai Huiqin, Sun Dongxia. Design and verification of intelligent organic fertilizer applicator [J]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2024, 45(2): 275-279.
[2]	Zhang Jianlu, Wang Pengfei, Chen Chunhao, Li Jianping, Wang Xu. Design and test of fertilizer discharging device for ditching fertilizer applicator in apple orchard [J]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2024, 45(1): 83-89.
[3]	Liu Xinpeng, , Jiao Jing, , Niu Zhaojun, Du Jihua, , Huang Xiaohong, , Li Zunxiang, . Design and test of vibrating organic fertilizer discharge device [J]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2023, 44(9): 43-50.
[4]	Xu Binxing, Chen Yongsheng, Chen Mingjiang, Ma Biao, Gao Qimin, Wu Aibing. Research status and development trend of organic fertilizer application equipment for field crops in China [J]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2022, 43(12): 20-25.
[5]	Zhang Jianchao, Shan Huiyong, Jing Xiangyang, Li Chenyang, Zhang Chenghao, Liu Huiqin.. Prediction method of greenhouse environmental factors based on Elman neural network [J]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2021, 42(8): 203-208.