English

中国农机化学报

中国农机化学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (12): 190-196.DOI: 10.13733/j.jcam.issn.2095-5553.2022.12.028

• 农业水土工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

土地综合整治项目实施效益评价——基于AHP-PCE模型

慕哲哲1, 2, 3   

  1. 1. 自然资源部退化及未利用土地整治工程重点实验室,西安市,710021; 

    2. 陕西省土地工程建设集团有限责任公司,西安市,710075; 

    3. 陕西地建土地工程技术研究院有限责任公司,西安市,710021
  • 出版日期:2022-12-15 发布日期:2022-12-02
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省土地工程建设集团内部项目(DJNY2021—25、DJNY2022—55)

Implementation benefit evaluation of comprehensive land consolidation project: Based on AHP-PCE model

Mu Zhezhe   

  • Online:2022-12-15 Published:2022-12-02

摘要: 为研究土地综合整治工程实施前后项目区总体建设效益情况,明晰土地综合整治工程建设过程中存在的问题及可提升潜力指标,以法库县龙家村土地整治项目为例,从经济效益、社会效益、生态效益和景观效益4个方面选取14个评价指标,采用多层次模糊综合评价法测算各效益分值及综合分值,并划分评价等级。研究结果表明:项目区土地综合整治工程综合效益分值为82.10,综合评价等级为良好。经济效益、社会效益、生态效益和景观效益表现为“一优三良”。其中,社会效益分值为86.15,评价等级为优秀;经济效益、生态效益、景观效益分值分别为80.74、82.12和79.41,评价等级均为良好。经济效益、社会效益、生态效益和景观效益均有所提升,但经济效益和景观效益与项目预期建设目标存在差距,其中新增耕地指标、项目区总产值指标及景观丰富度指标有较大提升潜力。

关键词: 土地整治, 效益评价, 层次分析法, 模糊综合评价

Abstract: In order to study the overall construction benefit of the project area before and after the implementation of the comprehensive land consolidation project, and clarify the problems existing in the construction process of the comprehensive land consolidation project and the potential indicators for improvement, this study takes the land consolidation project of Longjia Village in Faku County as an example. 14 evaluation indexes are selected from four aspects of economic benefit, social benefit, ecological benefit and landscape benefit. The multilevel fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is used to calculate the benefit scores and comprehensive scores, and the evaluation grades are divided. The results show that the comprehensive benefit score of land comprehensive improvement project in the project area is 82.10, and the comprehensive evaluation level is good. Economic benefit, social benefit, ecological benefit and landscape benefit are ‘one excellent three good’. Among them, the social benefit score is 86.15, the evaluation grade is excellent ; the scores of economic benefit, ecological benefit and landscape benefit were 80.74, 82.12 and 79.41, respectively, and the evaluation levels were good. Economic benefit, social benefit, ecological benefit and landscape benefit have been improved, but there is a gap between economic benefit and landscape benefit and the expected construction goal of the project. Among them, the new cultivated land index, the total output value index of the project area and the landscape richness index have great potential for improvement.

Key words: land consolidation, benefit evaluation, analytic hierarchy process, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation

中图分类号: