English

中国农机化学报

中国农机化学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1): 151-156.DOI: 10.13733/j.jcam.issn.2095-5553.2025.01.023

• 农业信息化工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于无人机光谱图像多数据融合的大豆地上生物量估测研究

张庆1,李金阳1,石文强1,亓立强1,张伟1, 2   

  1. 1. 黑龙江八一农垦大学工程学院,黑龙江大庆,163319;
    2. 农业农村部大豆机械化生产重点实验室,黑龙江大庆,163319
  • 出版日期:2025-01-15 发布日期:2025-01-24
  • 基金资助:
    国家现代农业产业技术体系专项(CARS—04—PS30);北方寒地机械化保护性耕作技术创新研究团队(TDJH201808)

Study on estimation of soybean aboveground biomass based on multi data fusion of unmanned aerial vehicle spectral images#br#

Zhang Qing1, Li Jinyang1, Shi Wenqiang1, Qi Liqiang1, Zhang Wei1, 2   

  1. 1.  College of Engineering, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing, 163319, China;  2. Key Laboratory of Soybean Mechanization Production, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Daqing, 163319, China
  • Online:2025-01-15 Published:2025-01-24

摘要: 为提高大豆地上生物量(AGB)估测精度,提出基于无人机遥感技术的多数据融合估测AGB方法。使用多光谱无人机获取大豆始花期、始粒期冠层光谱图像,利用9种植被指数分别构建基于偏最小二乘回归(PLSR)和Lasso回归的叶面积指数(LAI)估测模型,并通过数字表面模型(DSM)估测大豆株高。将株高、LAI和9种植被指数作为模型参数,构建大豆AGB估测模型,分别对比PLSR与Lasso在始花期与始粒期的模型精度,确定最优AGB估测模型。结果表明:株高估测模型始花期R2=0.81,始粒期R2=087,株高拟合效果良好;LAI估测模型PLSR方法优于Lasso方法,始花期R2=0.81,始粒期R2=0.82;利用PLSR和Lasso回归两种方法构建AGB估测模型,通过对比分析PLSR的估测精度高于Lasso回归,始花期R2=0.65,始粒期R2=0.66;通过相关性分析,株高、LAI和植被指数与AGB呈现显著水平,在不同时期利用PLSR方法估测AGB的效果均优于Lasso方法,始花期和始粒期的R2、RMSE分别为0.80、0.17和0.82、1.26;利用不同时期估测模型验证不同大豆品种AGB精度均为85%以上。

关键词: 大豆, 地上生物量, 多光谱, 植被指数, 株高, 叶面积指数

Abstract:  In order to improve the accuracy of aboveground biomass (AGB) estimation in soybean, a multi-data fusion method based on UAV remote sensing technology was proposed to estimate AGB. A multispectral UAV was used to acquire canopy spectral images of soybean at the flowering and grain initiation stages, and nine vegetation indices were used to construct leaf area index (LAI) estimation models based on partial least squares regression (PLSR) and Lasso regression, and the height of soybean plants was estimated by digital surface modeling (DSM). The plant height, LAI, and 9 vegetation indexes were used as model parameters to construct a soybean AGB estimation model, and the model accuracy of PLSR and Lasso during the initial flowering and grain stages was compared respectively to determine the optimal AGB estimation model. The results showed that the plant height estimation model had R2=0.81 at the beginning of flowering and R2=087 at the beginning of grain stage, which was a good fit for plant height. The PLSR method of LAI estimation was better than the Lasso method, with R2=081 at the beginning of flowering and R2=0.82 at the beginning of grain stage. The AGB estimation model was constructed by using the two methods of regression of PLSR and Lasso. The estimation accuracy of PLSR was higher than that of Lasso regression, with R2=0.65 at the beginning flower stage and R2=066 at the beginning grain stage. Through correlation analysis, plant height, LAI and vegetation index showed significant levels with AGB, and the estimation of AGB by using the PLSR method was better than that of the Lasso method at different periods, with R2 and RMSE at the beginning flower stage and the beginning grain stage, respectively, being 0.80, 0.17 and 0.82, 1.26 at the beginning flower and beginning grain stages, respectively. The accuracy of AGB of different soybean varieties was more than 85% by using the estimation models at different periods.

Key words: soybeans, aboveground biomass, multispectral, vegetation index, plant height, leaf area index

中图分类号: