现代农业产业园农民与合作社合约选择研究

doi:10.13733/j.jcam.issn.2095⁃5553.2022.03.025

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究现代农业产业园内合作社带动方式及作用，选取21个粮油、林果、蔬菜类主导产业的国家现代农业产业园，基于信息熵模型引入农民与合作社合约选择集中度，研究合约选择的特征、影响及形成原因。结果表明：产业园以土地流转或社会化服务为主要合约类型。农民合约选择存在明显的差异化特征，集中度最高值为0.84，最低为0.01。集中度可通过筛选进入逐步回归模型，并且与合作社带动农民人数的灰色关联度为0.866 5，因此可作为表征合作社带动程度的指标。通过皮尔逊相关系数分析，产业发展水平、农户资源禀赋、合作社发展水平的不同是导致合约选择差异化的主要原因。最后，为现代农业产业园联农带农发展提出建议。现代农业产业园应进一步探索土地流转和社会化服务协同发展机制，不同现代农业产业园应试点探索适合自身发展的农民合作模式，现代农业产业园应注重农业科技创新的成果转化。

关键词: 现代农业产业园, 合作社, 信息熵, 社会化服务, 土地流转, 订单农业

Abstract: In order to explore the driving mode and function of cooperatives in modern agricultural industrial parks, 21 national modern agricultural industrial parks with grain and oil industries, forest and fruit industries, and vegetable industries were selected as the research objects. Based on the information entropy model, the concentration degree of contract selection between farmers and cooperatives was introduced to study the characteristics, influence and formation reasons of contract selection. The results showed that modern agricultural industrial parks took land circulation or socialized service as the main contract type. Farmers’ contract selection had obvious differentiation characteristics, with the highest concentration degree being 0.84, and the lowest being 0.01. Concentration was screened into the stepwise regression model, whereby the grey correlation degree between concentration and the number of people driven by cooperatives was 0.866 5, in which case it can be used as an indicator to characterize the degree of driving by cooperatives. Through the analysis of Pearson’s correlation coefficient, differences in the level of industrial development, farmers’ resource endowments, and cooperative development levels were the main reasons for the differentiation of contract selection. Finally, suggestions for the development of the modern agricultural industrial park were put forward. Modern agricultural industrial parks should further explore the synergistic development mechanism of land transfer and socialized services. Different modern agricultural industrial parks should pilot and explore farmers’ cooperation models suitable for their own development. Modern agricultural industrial parks should focus on the transformation of agricultural scientific and technological innovations.

Key words: modern agricultural industrial park, cooperative, information entropy, socialized service, land transfer, contract farming

中图分类号:

F321.4

张天柱, 詹建臻, 周磊, 刘骕, 白春明. 现代农业产业园农民与合作社合约选择研究[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2022, 43(3): 185-196.

Zhang Tianzhu, Zhan Jianzhen, Zhou Lei, Liu Su, Bai Chunming.. Research on the contract selection between farmers and cooperatives in modern agricultural industrial park[J]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2022, 43(3): 185-196.

参考文献

[1] 农业部, 财政部. 农业部财政部关于开展国家现代农业产业园创建工作的通知[EB/OL]. http://www.moa.gov.cn/nybgb/2017/dsiqi/201712/t20171229_6133445.htm, 2017-04-20.
[2] 孔祥智, 穆娜娜. 实现小农户与现代农业发展的有机衔接[J]. 农村经济, 2018(2): 1-7.
[3] 苑鹏. 农民专业合作组织与农业社会化服务体系建设[J]. 农村经济, 2011(1): 3-5.
Yuan Peng. Construction of farmer professional cooperatives and agricultural social services system [J]. Rural Economy, 2011(1): 3-5.
[4] 仝志辉, 楼栋. 农业社会化服务: 体系研究的肢解和进行整体性研究的可能[J]. 农林经济管理学报, 2014, 13(2): 124-128.
Tong Zhihui, Lou Dong. Agricultural socialized service system: Likelihood of decomposing research system and conducting holistic research [J]. Journal of Agro⁃Forestry Economics and Management, 2014, 13(2): 124-128.
[5] 李刚, 刘灵芝. 交易额返利率对农民参与度的影响——以贵州省盘州市村级农民专业合作社为例[J]. 农业经济问题, 2019(10): 111-120.
Li Gang, Liu Lingzhi. The impact of the return rate of transaction volume on farmers’ participation degree: A case study of village⁃run cooperatives in Panzhou City, Guizhou Province [J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2019(10): 111-120.
[6] 苟茜, 罗必良, 王宣喻. 专用性投资、交易成本与农民入社行为选择[J]. 农村经济, 2018(12): 62-66.
[7] 马彦丽, 施轶坤. 农户加入农民专业合作社的意愿、行为及其转化——基于13个合作社340个农户的实证研究[J]. 农业技术经济, 2012(6): 101-108.
[8] 叶飞, 蔡子功. “随行就市,保底收购”还是“土地入股”?——农户加盟农业组织模式的两难抉择[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2019, 39(8): 2049-2057.
Ye Fei, Cai Zigong. Protection prices or land dividends? -The dilemma of farmers joining agriculture organization mode [J]. Systems Engineering⁃Theory & Practice, 2019, 39(8): 2049-2057.
[9] 陈江华, 李道和, 孙水鹅, 等. 江西省农民专业合作社社员参与合作社订单农业的影响因素[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2014, 42(12): 243-248.
Chen Jianghua, Li Daohe, Sun Shuie, et al. Factors in fluencing professional cooperative members’ participation in contract farming [J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 42(12): 243-248.
[10] 于海龙, 张振. 土地托管的形成机制、适用条件与风险规避: 山东例证[J]. 改革, 2018(4): 110-119.
Yu Hailong, Zhang Zhen. Formation mechanism, applicable conditions and risk aversion of land trusteeship: Taking Shandong as an example [J]. Reform, 2018(4): 110-119.
[11] 董翀, 钟真, 孔祥智. 订单农业对农户的影响总是有效吗?——买方垄断和非垄断市场订单农业参与效果的对比研究[J]. 商业经济与管理, 2015(4): 16-23.
Dong Chong, Zhong Zhen, Kong Xiangzhi. Is contract farming always effective? - A comparative study of the effect of farmers’ participation in contract framing in the monopsony and non⁃monopsony market [J]. Journal of Business Economics, 2015(4): 16-23.
[12] 郭荣中, 申海建, 杨敏华. 长株潭地区土地利用结构信息熵时空测度与演化[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2019, 40(9): 92-100.
Guo Rongzhong, Shen Haijian, Yang Minhua. Spatial⁃temporal assessment and evolution research of information entropy of land use structures in Chang⁃Zhu⁃Tan Region [J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2019, 40(9): 92-100.
[13] 匡兵, 周敏, 陈丹玲. 岳阳市土地利用结构变化与土地利用绩效的关联度分析[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2017, 36(1): 137-142.
Kuang Bing, Zhou Min, Chen Danling. Evolution of land use structure and its correlation degree with land use performance in Yueyang City [J]. Areal research and Development, 2017, 36(1): 137-142.
[14] 谢汀, 刘爱宁, 高雪松, 等. 基于信息熵和灰色关联的成都市建设用地结构时空变化及驱动力分析[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2015, 36(1): 118-125.
Xie Ting, Liu Aining, Gao Xuesong, et al. Temporal⁃spatial changes and driving forces of built⁃up land structure in Chengdu city based on information entropy and gray correlative degree analyses [J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2015, 36(1): 118-125.
[15] Xavier A, Freitas M B, MDS Rosário, et al. Disaggregating statistical data at field level: An entropy approach [J]. CEFAGE⁃UE Working Papers, 2016, 23: 91-108.
[16] Leibovici D G, Claramunt C. On integrating size and shape distributions into a spatio⁃temporal information entropy framework [J]. Entropy, 2019, 21(11): 1112.
[17] 严奉宪, 胡译丹. 新常态下农村居民消费结构的变化与优化[J]. 统计与决策, 2018, 34(6): 98-101.
[18] 余向洋, 张圆刚, 朱国兴, 等. 基于熵测度方法的旅游季节性研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(8): 1240-1247.
Yu Xiangyang, Zhang Yuangang, Zhu Guoxing, et al. Tourism seasonality based on entropy measuring [J]. Progress in Geography, 2019, 38(8): 1240-1247.
[19] 周立群, 曹利群. 商品契约优于要素契约——以农业产业化经营中的契约选择为例[J]. 经济研究, 2002(1): 14-19, 93.
Zhou Liqun, Cao Liqun. Factor contract is superior to commodity contract [J]. Economic Research Journal, 2002(1): 14-19, 93.
[20] 张露, 罗必良. 农业减量化的困境及其治理: 从要素合约到合约匹配[J]. 江海学刊, 2020(3): 77-83.
[21] 付榕, 王静. 不同农业类型下农户合作意愿及影响因素的差异分析[J]. 统计与决策, 2015(17): 116-118.
[22] 李敏, 王礼力, 郭海丽. 农户参与合作社意愿的影响因素分析——基于陕西省杨凌示范区的数据[J]. 云南社会科学, 2015(3): 63-67.
[23] 刘馨月, 周力. 订单农业契约属性安排:农户风险态度与契约选择决策[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 20(2): 140-148.
Liu Xinyue, Zhou Li. Agricultural contract arrangement: Farmers’ risk attitude and contract choice decision [J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 20(2): 140-148.
[24] 杨歌谣, 周常春. 农户禀赋对农户融入农产品供应链意愿及方式的影响——基于西南地区的农户调查[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2021, 42(3): 224-231.
Yang Geyao, Zhou Changchun. The effects of household endowment on rural households’ willingness and ways to integrate into agricultural productsupply chain: Based on the survey of rural households in Southwest China [J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2021, 42(3): 224-231.
[25] 吴曼, 王丽丽, 赵帮宏, 等. 农户禀赋异质性与农业契约选择[J]. 统计与决策, 2021, 37(2): 172-176.
[26] 石敏, 李大胜, 吴圣金. 资本下乡中农户的合作行为、合作意愿及契约选择意愿研究[J]. 贵州财经大学学报, 2021(2): 100-110.
Shi Min, Li Dasheng, Wu Shengjin. Study on farmers’cooperative behavior, cooperative willingness and willingness tochoose contracts in the process of capital going to the countryside [J]. Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, 2021(2): 100-110.
[27] 邓宏图, 赵燕, 杨芸. 从合作社转向合作联社：市场扩展下龙头企业和农户契约选择的经济逻辑——以山西省太谷县某龙头企业和土地合作社为例[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(9): 111-128.
Deng Hongtu, Zhao Yan, Yang Yun. From cooperatives to cooperative associations: The economic logic of contract selection between leading enterprises and farmers under market expansion [J]. Management World, 2020, 36(9): 111-128.
[28] 张海丰, 王琳. 权力不对等、合约选择与制度供给——一个农地流转的博弈框架[J]. 学习与探索, 2021(2): 102-109.
[29] 刘守英, 颜嘉楠, 冀县卿. 集体地权制度下农地合约选择与经营体制变迁——松江集体村社型家庭农场的案例分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2021(2): 19-41.
Liu Shouying, Yan Jia’nan, Ji Xianqing. The choice of farmland contract and the change of management system under collective farmland ownership: A case study based on Songjiang communal family farms [J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2021(2): 19-41.
[30] 张建雷. 农业现代化进程中的合约风险及治理机制研究——基于“政府—市场”互构的视角[J]. 经济学家, 2020(4): 119-127.
Zhang Jianlei. Research on contract risk and governance mechanism in the process of agricultural modernization-Based on the perspective of "government⁃market" mutual construction [J]. Economist, 2020(4): 119-127.
[31] 朋文欢, 黄祖辉. 契约安排、农户选择偏好及其实证——基于选择实验法的研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2017, 47(4): 143-158.
Peng Wenhuan, Huang Zuhui. Contractual arrangement, choice preferences and empirical researches for smallholders: A study based on choice experiment [J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 2017, 47(4): 143-158.
[32] 张莹, 肖海峰. 农牧户产业链纵向协作模式选择意愿及影响因素分析——基于羊绒产业的调研数据[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2016, 37(4): 709-715.
Zhang Ying, Xiao Haifeng. Analysis on ranchers’ choice and influencing factors of vertical collaboration: A case study of cashmere industry [J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2016, 37(4): 709-715.
[33] 韩喜艳, 刘伟, 高志峰. 小农户参与农业全产业链的选择偏好及其异质性来源——基于选择实验法的分析[J]. 中国农村观察, 2020(2): 81-99.
Han Xiyan, Liu Wei, Gao Zhifeng. Selection preference and preference heterogeneity of smallholders’ participation in agricultural industrial chain: An analysis based on the choice experiment method [J]. China Rural Survey, 2020(2): 81-99.
[34] 钟颖琦, 黄祖辉, 吴林海. 农户加入合作社意愿与行为的差异分析[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 16(6): 66-74.
Zhong Yingqi, Huang Zuhui, Wu Linhai. Difference between willingness and behavior of farmer’s participation in cooperatives: An empirical analysis and policy proposal [J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Social Science Edition), 2016, 16(6): 66-74.
[35] 钟真, 胡珺祎, 曹世祥. 土地流转与社会化服务：“路线竞争”还是“相得益彰”？——基于山东临沂12个村的案例分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2020(10): 52-70.
Zhong Zhen, Hu Junyi, Cao Shixiang. Land transfer and agricultural services: ‘Route competition’ or ‘Mutual reinforcement’? An analysis based on cases from 12 villages in Linyi, Shandong Province [J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2020(10): 52-70.
[36] 刘大鹏, 刘颖, 陈实. 土地流转、规模经营对农业社会化服务需求的影响分析——基于江汉平原393个水稻种植大户的调查[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2019, 40(1): 170-176.
Liu Dapeng, Liu Ying, Chen Shi. Analysis of the influence of land transfer and scale management on the agricultural social service demand-Based on the survey of 393 large rice growers in Jianghan Plain [J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2019, 40(1): 170-176.
[37] 黄玛兰, 李晓云, 曾琳琳. 农户资本禀赋对水稻生产生态效率的影响——以湖北省为例[J/OL]. 中国农业资源与区划: 1-10 [2022-02-21]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.3513.S.20211130.1322.024.html.
[38] 田逸飘, 张卫国. 资源禀赋、能力水平与农户参与特色农业经营——基于武陵山区建档贫困户的调查分析[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(11): 109-117.
Tian Yipiao, Zhang Weiguo. Resource endowment and ability level of farmer households as related to their participation on characteristic agriculture management-Based on a survey of filed poor farmer households in Wuling mountain area [J]. Journal of Southwest University(Natural Science Edition), 2020, 42(11): 109-117.