机械通风猪舍卧式末端废气净化系统除氨效率试验研究

doi:10.13733/j.jcam.issn.20955553.2022.06.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为提高猪舍规模化养殖中废气净化的效率，针对机械通风猪舍中采用酸洗喷淋法的卧式废气净化系统开展试验研究。通过结合正交试验方案，利用极差分析与方差分析方法，研究在采用酸洗喷淋法的卧式废气净化系统中通风速度，酸洗泵频率、喷淋方向关键工艺参数对除氨效率的影响规律。试验结果表明：喷淋方向对除氨效率有显著影响，且在错流喷淋方向上效率最高，平均除氨效率比顺流方向效率高6.87%，比逆流方向效率高18.88%。通风风速的降低能提高除氨效率，在保证足够的酸洗泵压力时，酸洗泵压力的提高对除氨效率影响不大。通过极差分析，方差分析得出卧式废气净化系统中喷淋方向为错流，酸洗泵频率为30 Hz，通风风速为1 m/sA1B2C1的除氨效果理论上最好。最后根据其各组合除氨效率以及耗电量，列举出较优方案为产品化设计提供参考。

关键词: 末端废气净化系统, 酸洗喷淋法, 填料结构, 除氨效率, 正交试验

Abstract: In order to improve the efficiency of waste gas purification in largescale pig farming, this paper studied the horizontal exhaust gas purification system using the acid spray scrubbing method in mechanically ventilated pig houses. Combined with the orthogonal test plan and using the range analysis and variance analysis methods, this paper analyzed the influence mechanism of key process parameters such as the ventilation speed, the frequency of the pickling pump, and the spray direction in the acid spray scrubbing method on the efficiency of ammonia removal. The test results showed that the spray direction has a significant effect on the ammonia removal efficiency. The average ammonia removal efficiency was 6.87% higher than the downstream efficiency and 18.88% higher than the countercurrent efficiency. The reduction of the ventilation wind speed can improve the ammonia removal efficiency. When ensuring sufficient acid cleaning pump pressure, the increase of the acid cleaning pump pressure had little effect on the ammonia removal efficiency. Through range analysis and variance analysis, it can be concluded that in horizontal exhaust gas purification system, the spraying direction was crossflow, picking frequency was 30 Hz, and ventilation wind speed was 1 m/s, the ammonia removal effect was theovetically the best. Finally, according to the ammonia removal efficiency and power consumption of each combination, the optimal scheme was listed to provide reference for product design.

Key words: end exhaust gas purification system, pickling spray method, packing structure, ammonia removal efficiency, orthogonal test

中图分类号:

S818.9

刘喜佳, 王昱, 孙超, 曾志雄, 吕恩利, . 机械通风猪舍卧式末端废气净化系统除氨效率试验研究[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2022, 43(6): 90-95.

Liu Xijia, Wang Yu, Sun Chao, Zeng Zhixiong, Lü Enli. . Experimental study on ammonia removal efficiency of horizontal end exhaust gas purification system for mechanically ventilated pig houses[J]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2022, 43(6): 90-95.

参考文献

［1］汪开英, 代小蓉. 畜禽场空气污染对人畜健康的影响［J］. 中国畜牧杂志, 2008, 44（10）: 32-35.
Wang Kaiying, Dai Xiaorong. Effect of air pollution in the livestock and poultry farm on human and animal health ［J］. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2008, 44（10）: 32-35.
［2］王宇. NH3对仔猪生产性能影响的研究［D］. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2019.
Wang Yu. Study on the effect of NH3 on production performance of piglets ［D］. Changchun: Jilin Agricultural University, 2019.
［3］孙燕, 张玮. 氨的职业危害与预防［J］. 安全, 2010, 31（6）: 48-50.
［4］郭霞, 李伯阳, 莫文锐, 等. 低浓度有毒有害气体净化技术及研究进展［J］. 环境科学导刊, 2016, 35（S1）: 125-131.
Guo Xia, Li Boyang, Mo Wenrui, et al. Advances of technologies of purifying poisonous and harmful gas with low concentration ［J］. Environmental Science Survey, 2016, 35（S1）: 125-131.
［5］王艾伦, 金敬岗, 汪开英. 畜禽场微生物除臭技术的研究进展［J］. 中国畜牧杂志, 2019, 55（1）: 18-21, 28.
Wang Ailun, Jin Jinggang, Wang Kaiying. Research progress on microbial deodorization technologies in livestock farms ［J］. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2019, 55（1）: 18-21, 28.
［6］于立芝, 王伟, 徐榕雪. 畜禽养殖大气污染防治技术［J］. 黑龙江农业科学, 2018（11）: 167-168, 171.
Yu Lizhi, Wang Wei, Xu Rongxue. Prevention and control technology of air pollution in livestock and poultry breeding ［J］. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018（11）: 167-168, 171.
［7］ Hadlocon L, Manuzon R B, Zhao L. Development and evaluation of a fullscale spray scrubber for ammonia recovery and production of nitrogen fertilizer at poultry facilities ［J］. Environmental Technology, 2015, 36（1-4）: 405-416.
［8］ Hadlocon L, Manuzon R B, Zhao L. Optimization of ammonia absorption using acid spray wet scrubbers ［J］. Transactions of the ASABE, 2014, 57（2）: 647-659.
［9］ Manuzon R B, Yang L, Keener H M, et al. A prototype acid spray scrubber for absorbing ammonia emissions from exhaust fans of animal buildings ［J］. Transactions of the ASABE, 2007, 50（4）: 1395-1407.
［10］ Jafari M J, Matin A H, Rahmati A, et al. Experimental optimization of a spray tower for ammonia removal ［J］. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 2018, 9（4）: 783-790.
［11］ Heyden C, Demeyer P, Volcke E. Mitigating emissions from pig and poultry housing facilities through air scrubbers and biofilters: Stateoftheart and perspectives ［J］. Biosystems Engineering, 2015, 134: 74-93.
［12］ Hadlocon L, Soboyejo A, Zhao L, et al. Statistical modeling of ammonia absorption efficiency of an acid spray scrubber using regression analysis ［C］. ASABE & CSBE/SCGAB International Meeting, 2014.
［13］ Perry R H, Green D W, Maloney J O. Perrys chemical engineers handbook ［M］. New York: McGrawHill, 1984.
［14］ Theodore L. Air pollution control equipment calculations ［M］. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
［15］ Jafari M J, Matin A H, Rahmati A, et al. Experimental optimization of a spray tower for ammonia removal ［J］. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 2018, 9（4）: 783-790.
［16］王昱, 吴鹏, 曾志雄, 等. 规模化猪舍废气复合净化系统设计与试验［J］. 农业机械学报, 2020, 51（4）: 344-352.
Wang Yu, Wu Peng, Zeng Zhixiong, et al. Design and experiment of combination air scrubbing system for largescale pig house ［J］. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2020, 51（4）: 344-352.
［17］ Hadlocon L, Zhao L, Manuzon R B, et al. An acid spray scrubber for recovery of ammonia emissions from a deeppit swine facility ［J］. Transactions of the ASABE, 2014, 57: 949-960.
［18］刘瑞江, 张业旺, 闻崇炜, 等. 正交试验设计和分析方法研究［J］. 实验技术与管理, 2010, 27（9）: 52-55.
Liu Ruijiang, Zhang Yewang, Wen Chongwei, et al. Study on the design and analysis method of orthogonal experiment ［J］. Experimental Technology and Management, 2010, 27（9）: 52-55.
［19］邓振伟, 于萍, 陈玲. SPSS软件在正交试验设计、结果分析中的应用［J］. 电脑学习, 2009（5）: 15-17.
Deng Zhenwei, Yu Ping, Chen Ling. Application of SPSS software in orthogonal design and result analysis ［J］. Computer Study, 2009（5）: 15-17.
［20］郝拉娣, 张娴, 刘琳. 科技论文中正交试验结果分析方法的使用［J］. 编辑学报, 2007, 19（5）: 340-341.
Hao Ladi, Zhang Xian, Liu Lin. Analysis method of results in orthogonal design in scientific papers ［J］. Acta Editologica, 2007, 19（5）: 340-341.

〖MZ(1H〗Experimental study on ammonia removal efficiency of horizontal end
exhaust gas purification system for mechanically ventilated pig housesLiu Xijia1, Wang Yu1, 2, Sun Chao1, Zeng Zhixiong1, 2, Lü Enli1, 2〖MZ)〗
（1. College of Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Key Technology on Agricultural Machine and Equipment, Ministry of Education,
South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China）

[1]	石鑫, 杨豫新, 乔园园, 吐鲁洪·吐尔迪, 牛长河, 杨会民, . 薄皮扁桃低损伤脱壳分析与试验[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2022, 43(9): 81-87.
[2]	曹永峰, 陈高峰, , 王飞仁, 曾志雄, 吕恩利, 郭嘉明. 保育猪智能粥料饲喂系统设计与试验[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2022, 43(7): 36-43.
[3]	杜许怀, 韩长杰, 沈俊杰, 刁宏伟, 宋东良, 张书祥. 红枣捡拾机优化设计与试验[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2022, 43(6): 43-50.
[4]	朱凯, 马心坦, 徐维维. 拖拉机驾驶室结构噪声改进研究[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2022, 43(2): 98-103.
[5]	沈薛昊, 唐帅, 高辉松, 周永清, 薛金林. 气吸滚筒式蔬菜育苗播种流水线设计[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2022, 43(11): 15-23.
[6]	仇义, 戴晓锋, 陈智, 杨秀芳, 方学良, 戴念祖. 基于EDEM的冰草种子丸化机工艺参数优化仿真与试验[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2022, 43(11): 69-74.
[7]	扈伟昊, 杨发展, 赵国栋, 林云龙, 黄珂. 基于离散元法的立式旋耕刀工作参数分析与优化#br# #br# [J]. 中国农机化学报, 2022, 43(10): 25-32.
[8]	靳文停, 葛宜元, 樊文武, 马浏轩, 李文龙, 杨荣敏. 倒V型稻田株间除草装置虚拟仿真及验证[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2022, 43(10): 72-77.
[9]	牛其强, 王保兴, 董和银, 范国强, 吴爱兵, 刘猛. 自走式全混合日粮制备机取料仿真与参数优化[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2022, 43(10): 99-106.
[10]	朱承科, 李锋霞, 张佳, . 锯齿滚扎式残膜回收机设计与试验[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2021, 42(9): 25-30.
[11]	王莹, 李光, 张冲, 王华泽, 刘鸿雁, . 独立圆盘耙单体排列参数对秸秆堵塞影响研究[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2021, 42(8): 55-59.
[12]	郭祥雨;薛新宇;秦维彩;王珊;刘小明;. 植保无人机作业参数对棕榈树雾滴沉积的影响[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2021, 42(6): 35-40.
[13]	李向军;张成亮;赵大勇;吴家安;李庆达;周福君;. 气吹式垄台秸秆根茬处理机设计与试验[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2021, 42(5): 13-18.
[14]	李彦栋;石鑫;牛长河;张佳喜;. 大蒜播种机地轮及铺管覆膜机构改进设计与试验[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2021, 42(5): 35-41.
[15]	郭辉;谢知轩;王明闯;董元德;刘刚;赵国钰;. 籽用葫芦脱粒装置的优化设计与试验[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2020, 41(7): 28-33.