高标准农田建设对耕地质量的影响——以鹰潭市余江区为例

doi:10.13733/j.jcam.issn.2095-5553.2025.01.038

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究高标准农田建设对耕地质量等级的影响情况，分析各项评价指标因素在高标准农田建设前后的变化情况和对耕地质量的贡献程度，为余江区合理规划建设高标准农田、提高耕地质量提供科学参考和技术依据。以余江区2015年和2020年期间建设的高标准农田为例，通过RS技术和ArcGIS手段获取评价指标指数，从自然地理、土壤状况和人为管理3个角度构建评价指标体系，采用CRITIC法确定各指标权重，对高标准农田建设前后耕地质量进行评价，计算各指标贡献值。高标准农田建成后，总体耕地质量得到提升，Ⅰ级耕地面积增加1 165.59 hm2，增加21个百分点，平均耕地质量等级提升0.79个等级；从各行政乡镇提升情况来看，各地区均有提升，其中平定乡提升最多，提升0.75个等级，变化率为32.61%。在建设过程中，土壤水分指数贡献程度最高，耕地等级提升贡献值(CG)为0.244，贡献程度达30.96%，变化率为31.91%。余江区耕地质量等级在高标准农田建成后有较大提升，其中水利设施的贡献程度最高，在建成前后代表该方面指数的提升程度也最为明显。

关键词: 余江区, 高标准农田, 耕地质量, 等级评价, 土壤水分

Abstract: This paper investigated the impact of the construction of high-standard farmland on the quality level of cultivated land, analyzed the alterations of each evaluation index factor before and after the construction of highstandard farmland and the degree of contribution to the quality of cultivated land, and offered scientific references and technical bases for the rational planning and construction of high-standard farmland and the improvement of the quality of cultivated land in Yujiang District. Taking the high-standard farmland constructed in Yujiang District during 2015 and 2020 as an example, the evaluation index was obtained through RS technology and ArcGIS means, and the evaluation index system was constructed from three aspects such as physical geography, soil condition and human management. The CRITIC method was employed to determine the weight of each index, and the quality of cultivated land before and after the construction of high-standard farmland was evaluated. The contribution value of each indicator was calculated. After the construction of high-standard farmland, the overall quality of cultivated land was enhanced, the area of grade Ⅰ arable land increased by 1165.59 hm2, with an increase of 21 percentage points, and the average quality level of cultivated land rose by 0.79 levels. From the improvement situation of various administrative townships, all regions witnessed an improvement, among which Pingding Township had the most significant improvement, with an increase of 075 levels and a change rate of 3261%. During the construction process, the soil moisture index contributed the most, the contribution value (CG) of cultivated land grade improvement was 0.244, the contribution degree was 30.96%, and the change rate was 31.91%. The quality level of cultivated land in Yujiang District was improved significantly after the completion of high-standard farmland, in which the contribution of water conservancy facilities was the highest, and the improvement of this index was also the most notable before and after the completion.

Key words: Yujiang District, high standard farmland, cultivated land quality, grade evaluation, soil moisture

中图分类号:

F323.21

廖通霖, 叶英聪, 匡丽花, . 高标准农田建设对耕地质量的影响——以鹰潭市余江区为例[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2025, 46(1): 255-263.

Liao Tonglin, Ye Yingcong, , Kuang Lihua, . Influence of high standard farmland construction on cultivated land quality and the contribution of factor index: A case study of Yujiang District, Yingtan City#br#[J]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2025, 46(1): 255-263.

参考文献

［1］　杨龙, 何靖. 陕西省关中渭河平原区耕地质量评价指标体系构建［J］. 中国农机化学报, 2023, 44(5): 208-213.
Yang Long, He Jing. Construction of evaluation index system of cultivated land quality of Guanzhoug Weihe Plain in Shaanxi Province ［J］.Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2023, 44(5): 208-213.
［2］　杨建宇, 杜贞容, 杜振博, 等. 基于耕地质量评价和局部空间自相关的高标准农田划定［J］. 农业机械学报, 2017, 48(6): 109-115.
Yang Jianyu, Du Zhenrong, Du Zhenbo, et al. Well facilitied capital farmland assignment based on land quality evaluation and LISA ［J］. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2017, 48(6): 109-115.
［3］　Ye Y, Kuang L, Zhao X, et al. Scenariobased simulation of land use in Yingtan (Jiangxi Province, China) using an integrated genetic algorithmcellular automataMarkov model ［J］. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27: 30390-30404.
［4］　Kuang L, Ye Y, Zhao X, et al. Delineation of basic farmland based on the quality and spatial stability: A case study of Yingtan City, China ［J］. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29(59): 88737-88750.
［5］　Zhao R, Li J, Wu K, et al. Cultivated land use zoning based on soil function evaluation from the perspective of black soil protection ［J］. Land, 2021, 10(6): 605.
［6］　Xu K, Jin X, Wu D, et al. Cultivated land quality evaluation of land consolidation project based on agricultural land gradation ［J］. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(7): 247-255.
［7］　傅幸之. 市县级国土空间农业生产适宜性评价方法优化［J］. 规划师, 2020, 36(8): 20-25.Fu Xingzhi. Improving agricultural production suitability evaluation of national land use and space at cty and county levels ［J］. Planners, 2019, 36(8): 20-25.
［8］　王建华, 陶培峰, 袁月, 等. PSR框架下的黑龙江省海伦市耕地质量评价［J］. 地质与资源, 2020, 29(6): 525-532.Wang Jianhua, Tao Peifeng, Yuan Yue, et al. PSR-based evaluation of the cultivated land quality in Hailun City of Heilongjiang Province ［J］. Geology and Resources, 2019, 29(6): 525-532.
［9］　朱瑕, 张立亭, 靳焕焕. 基于因素法和SVM模型的耕地质量评价方法研究［J］. 土壤通报, 2020, 51(3): 561-567.Zhu Xia, Zhang Liting, Jin Huanhuan. Cultivated land quality assessment methodology based on factor method and SVM model ［J］. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2020, 51(3): 561-567
［10］　钟莉娜, 王军. 基于InVEST模型评估土地整治对生境质量的影响［J］. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(1): 250-255.
Zhong Lina, Wang Jun. Evaluation on effect of land consolidation on habitat quality based on InVEST model ［J］. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33(1): 250-255.
［11］　梁志妹, 童江云, 谭海燕, 等. 基于GIS的昆明市耕地质量等级评价［J］. 安徽农业科学, 2022, 50(4): 87-90, 114.Liang Zhimei, Tong Jiangyun, Tan Haiyan, et al. Grade evaluation of cultivated land quality in Kunming based on GIS ［J］. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 50(4): 87-90, 114.
［12］　张超, 高璐璐, 郧文聚, 等. 遥感技术获取耕地质量评价指标的研究进展分析［J］. 农业机械学报, 2022, 53(1): 1-13.
Zhang Chao, Gao Lulu, Yun Wenju, et al. Research progress on obtaining cultivated land quality evaluation indexes by remote sensing ［J］. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2022, 53(1): 1-13.
［13］　钱凤魁, 项子璇, 王贺兴, 等. 基于最小数据集与LESA体系的县域耕地质量评价［J］. 农业工程学报, 2023, 39(8): 239-248.
Qian Fengkui, Xiang Zixuan, Wang Hexing, et al. Evaluating cultivated land quality in county territory using the minimum data set, land evaluation and site assessment (LESA) ［J］. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2023, 39(8): 239-248.
［14］　任斌裕, 张清, 周晓桢. 基于数据挖掘模型的耕地质量评价研究［J］. 江西科学, 2022, 40(6): 1091-1095.Ren Binyu, Zhang Qing, Zhou Xiaozhen. Research on cultivated land quality evaluation based on data mining model ［J］. Jiangxi Science, 2022, 40(6): 1091-1095.
［15］　马雪莹, 邵景安, 曹飞. 重庆山区县域高标准基本农田建设综合成效评估——以重庆市垫江县为例［J］. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(12): 2183-2199.Ma Xueying, Shao Jingan, Cao Fei. Comprehensive performance evaluation of high standard farmland construction in mountainous counties: A case study in Dianjiang, Chongqing ［J］. Journal of Natural Resources, 2018, 33(12): 2183-2199
［16］　王晓青, 史文娇, 邢晓旭, 等. 高标准农田建设适宜性评价、效益评价及影响因素解析的研究方法综述［J］. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(19): 131-142.
Wang Xiaoqing, Shi Wenjiao, Xing Xiaoxu, et al. Highstandard farmland: A review of methods on construction suitability evaluation,benefit evaluation and influencing factors ［J］. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(19): 131-142.
［17］　任先鹏, 李彦, 程春国, 等. 高标准农田建设项目区耕地质量等级评价研究——以肇东市明久乡为例［J］. 现代农业科技, 2022(24): 203-207.Ren Xianpeng, Li Yan, Cheng Chunguo, et al. Research on evaluation of cultivated land quality grades in highstandard farmland construction project areas: Taking Mingjiu township, Zhaodong City as an example ［J］. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022(24): 203-207.
［18］　Du G, Liu Y, Yu F, et al. Evolution of concepts of cultivated land quality and recognition ［J］. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(14): 243-249.
［19］　包艳丽, 张洪. 基于CRITIC权灰靶模型的云南省土地生态安全评价［J］. 上海国土资源, 2020, 41(2): 48-53.Bao Yanli, Zhang Hong. Land ecological security assessment of Yunnan Province based on the CRITIC weighted gray target model ［J］. Shanghai Land & Resources, 2020, 41(2): 48-53.
［20］　Wu J, Wu J. Cluster analysis and K-means clustering: An introduction ［J］. Advances in K-Means clustering: A Data Mining Thinking, 2012: 1-16.
［21］　Ye F, Wang L, Razzaq A, et al. Policy impacts of highStandard farmland construction on agricultural sustainability: Total factor productivitybased analysis ［J］. Land, 2023, 12(2): 283.
［22］　Deininger K, Monchuk D, Nagarajan H K, et al. Does land fragmentation increase the cost of cultivation? Evidence from India ［J］. The Journal of Development Studies, 2017, 53(1): 82-98.
［23］　甘华军, 赵智. 基于景观指数的黔中经济区耕地细碎化时空特征——以贵安新区为例［J］. 中南农业科技, 2022, 43(2): 98-104, 109.
［24］　赵龙山, 侯瑞, 吴发启, 等. 坡度对农业耕作措施水土保持作用的影响［J］. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(3): 69-72, 78.
Zhao Longshan, Hou Rui, Wu Faqi, et al. Effects of slope gradient on soil and water conservation benefit of tillage practices in agricultural lands ［J］. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 31(3): 69-72, 78.
［25］　潘忠成, 袁溪, 李敏. 降雨强度和坡度对土壤氮素流失的影响［J］. 水土保持学报, 2016, 30(1): 9-13.
Pan Zhongcheng, Yuan Xi, Li Min. Effects of rainfall intensity and slope gradient on soil nitrogen loss. ［J］. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 30(1): 9-13.
［26］　蔡庆空, 李二俊, 陶亮亮, 等. 利用改进温度植被干旱指数反演农田表层土壤水分的研究［J］. 土壤通报, 2021, 52(5): 1069-1077.
Cai Qingkong, Li Erjun, Tao Liangliang, et al. Surface soil moisture retrieval in crop fields using improved temperature vegetation dryness index ［J］. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2021, 52(5): 1069-1077.
［27］　张月, 王鸿斌, 韩兴, 等. NDMI与TCW在西藏低植被区土壤湿度监测中的比较［J］. 土壤通报, 2016, 47(3): 543-550.
Zhang Yue, Wang Hongbin, Han Xing, et al. Comparison of NDMI and TCW for soil moisture monitoring in tibet lowvegetative Area ［J］. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2016, 47(3): 543-550.
［28］　李斌, 王慧敏, 秦明周, 等. NDVI、NDMI与地表温度关系的对比研究［J］. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(5): 585-596.Li Bin, Wang Huimin, Qin Mingzhou, et al. Comparative study on the correlations between NDVI, NDMI and LST ［J］. Progress in Geography, 2017, 36(5): 585-596.
［29］　张天恩, 李子杰, 费坤, 等. 高标准农田建设对耕地质量的影响及灌排指标的贡献［J］. 农业资源与环境学报, 2022, 39(5): 978-989.
Zhang Tianen, Li Zijie, Fei Kun, et al. Effects of highstandard farmland construction on farmland quality and contribution of irrigation and drainage index ［J］. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2022, 39(5): 978-989.
［30］　江文娟, 汤萌萌, 汪甜甜, 等. 宣城市耕地质量等级及土壤养分空间分布特征［J］. 土壤通报, 2022, 53(1): 36-44.
Jiang Wenjuan, Tang Mengmeng, Wang Tiantian, et al. Spatial distribution characteristics of cultivated land quality grade and soil nutrients in Xuancheng City ［J］. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2022, 53(1): 36-44.
［31］　牟禹恒, 黄义忠, 梁睿, 等. 基于MODIS NDVI的文山州植被覆盖度及景观格局分析［J］. 西北林学院学报, 2023, 38(1): 174-180, 272.
Mu Yuheng, Huang Yizhong, Liang Rui, et al. Analysis of vegetati on coveringand landscape patternin Wenshan based on MODIS NDVI ［J］. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2023, 38(1): 174-180, 272.
［32］　Qiu J, Yang J, Wang Y, et al. A comparison of NDVI and EVI in the DisTrad model for thermal subpixel mapping in densely vegetated areas: A case study in Southern China ［J］. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2018, 39(8): 2105-2118.
［33］　史超, 黄超, 李书, 等. 矾山铜钼矿区重金属与覆盖植被胁迫相关性光谱特征［J］. 地质科技通报, 2020, 39(3): 202-210.Shi Chao, Huang Chao, Li Shu, et al. Spectral characteristics and correlation of heavy metals and vegetation cover stress in Fanshan coppermolybdenum ［J］. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2020, 39(3): 202-210.
［34］　Penuelas J, Frédéric Baret, Filella I. Semiempirical indices to assess carotenoids/chlorophyll: A ratio form leaf spectral reflectances ［J］. Photosynthetica, 1995, 31(2): 221-230.
［35］　李颖慧, 姜小三, 王振华, 等. 基于土壤肥力和重金属污染风险的农用地土壤质量综合评价研究［J］. 土壤通报, 2021, 52(5): 1052-1062.
Li Yinghui, Jiang Xiaosan, Wang Zhenhua, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of soil quality of agricultural land based on soil fertility and heavy metal pollution risk: A case study of boxing county, Shandong Province ［J］. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2021, 52(5): 1052-1062.
［36］　曹琳, 赵华甫, 陈学砧. 基于自然等提等潜力指数模型的耕地整治建设等别目标研究［J］. 中国农业资源与区划, 2017, 38(10): 74-80.
Cao Lin, Zhao Huafu, Chen Xuezhen. Based on the potential index model of the agriculture land physical quality grade of cultivated land renovation construction target ［J］. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2017, 38(10): 74-80.
［37］　陈正发, 龚爱民, 张刘东, 等. 基于质量评价的省域尺度坡耕地质量调控体系构建［J］. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(20): 136-145.
Chen Zhengfa, Gong Aimin, Zhang Liudong, et al. Construction of the quality regulation system for provincial scale slope farmland based on quality evaluation ［J］. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2021, 37(20): 136-145.

[1]	钱智勇, 王东博, 王东, 黄国亮, 杨振杰, 张毅杰. 地下滴灌土壤水分分布对作物根系构型影响的研究现状与展望[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2025, 46(1): 227-235.
[2]	尹正琳, 袁磊, 马显光, 郭晓洁. 基于熵权和理想点逼近法高原山地耕地质量评价——以云南省华坪县为例[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2025, 46(1): 236-241.
[3]	徐雨, 赵闰, 许永刚. 乡村振兴战略背景下促进农民增收的个性化研究——以盐城市芦蒲镇为例[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2024, 45(7): 310-315.
[4]	戴浩, 李傲波, 魏君英. 高标准农田建设政策和农机服务对农户收入的影响[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2024, 45(6): 257-263.
[5]	杨龙, 何靖. 陕西省关中渭河平原区耕地质量评价指标体系构建[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2023, 44(5): 208-213.
[6]	彭柳林, , 池泽新, 余永琦, . “十四五”时期丘陵山区农田宜机化改造路径与对策——以江西为例[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2023, 44(11): 210-215.
[7]	张睿智, 刘倩媛, 山长鑫, 杨晓文. “藏粮于地”战略下高标准农田建设模式研究^*[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2021, 42(11): 173-179.
[8]	陈蒙蒙;兰玉彬;王国宾;王杰;王宝聚;鲁文霞;. 基于土壤多参数监测系统的田间持水量试验研究[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2021, 42(1): 130-135+244.
[9]	郭辉;卜小东;黄可京;刘英超;. 基于热红外遥感影像的玉米田间土壤水分反演研究[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2020, 41(10): 203-210.