生计分化下农户低碳生产技术采纳行为绩效研究

doi:10.13733/j.jcam.issn.2095-5553.2024.07.044

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为明晰低碳技术采纳行为绩效，推进农户参与低碳化建设，基于695份稻农调研数据，综合运用数据包络分析法和倾向得分匹配法，测算农户低碳生产采纳行为绩效及群体间差异性。结果表明：样本农户的平均生产绩效为0.777 4，消除生产要素错配的影响，尚存在0.222 6的上升空间。低碳农业生产技术影响总样本农户农业生产绩效处理效应系数值均为正，但不显著。不同类型农户低碳农业生产技术采纳对农业生产绩效的影响呈现异质性。生活型、生存型和生产型三类农户采纳技术对农业生产绩效的影响不显著，仅功能型农户可以显著促进农业生产绩效提升。并指出未来需要加强宣传教育技术培训、构建政府与市场协同的农业低碳转型补偿机制、基于农户经营目标异质性分类实施激励政策和配套措施。

关键词: 低碳行为, 技术采纳绩效, 农户生计分化, 数据包络分析法, 倾向得分匹配法

Abstract: In order to clarify the performance of lowcarbon technology adoption behavior and promote farmers' participation in low-carbon construction, based on 695 rice farmer survey data, data envelopment analysis and propensity score matching methods were comprehensively used to calculate the performance of farmers' low-carbon production adoption behavior and group differences. The results indicated that the average production performance of the sample farmers was 0.777 4, and there was still room for an increase of 0.222 6 to eliminate the impact of production factor mismatch. The impact of lowcarbon agricultural production technology on the overall agricultural production performance of sample farmers was positive, but not significant. The impact of lowcarbon agricultural production technology adoption by different types of farmers on agricultural production performance showed heterogeneity. The adoption of technology by three types of farmers such as life type, survival type and production type, had no significant impact on agricultural production performance. Only functional farmers could significantly promote the improvement of agricultural production performance. The research put forward policy recommendations such as strengthening publicity education and technology training, building a collaborative compensation mechanism between the government and the market for agricultural low-carbon transformation, implementing incentive policies and supporting measures based on the heterogeneity of farmers' business objectives.

Key words: low carbon behavior, technology adoption performance, differentiation of farmers' livelihoods, data envelopment analysis, propensity score matching method

中图分类号:

F323

杨义风, 张利新, 王桂霞. 生计分化下农户低碳生产技术采纳行为绩效研究[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2024, 45(7): 302-309.

Yang Yifeng, Zhang Lixin, Wang Guixia. Research on the behavioral performance of farmers low carbon production technology adoption under livelihood differentiation[J]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2024, 45(7): 302-309.

参考文献

［1］　张俊飚, 何可. “双碳”目标下的农业低碳发展研究：现状、误区与前瞻［J］. 农业经济问题, 2022, 513(9): 35-46.
Zhang Junbiao, He Ke. Current situation, misunderstandings and prospects of agricultural lowcarbon development under the targets of carbon peak and carbon neutrality ［J］. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2022, 513(9): 35-46.
［2］　熊素, 罗蓉. “双碳”目标下中国农业绿色发展: 理论框架、困境审视及破局之道［J］. 农村经济, 2023, 484(2): 106-115.
Xiong Su, Luo Rong. Green development of agriculture in China under the “dual carbon” goal: Theoretical framework, dilemma review, and ways to break the situation ［J］. Rural Economy, 2023, 484(2): 106-115.
［3］　Cui Y， Khan S U， Deng Y, et al. Regional difference decomposition and its spatiotemporal dynamic evolution of chinese agricultural carbon emission: Considering carbon sink effect ［J］. Environmental Science and Pollution Research， 2021， 28: 38909-38928.
［4］　陈儒, 姜志德, 赵凯. 低碳视角下农业生态补偿的激励有效性［J］. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 18(5): 146-154.
Chen Ru, Jiang Zhide, Zhao Kai.Study on incentive effectiveness of agricultural ecological compensation under low carbon perspective ［J］. Journal of Northwest A & F University(Social Science Edition), 2018, 18(5): 146-154.
［5］　曾晶, 李剑, 青平, 等. 农户作物营养强化技术采纳提高了生产绩效吗？——基于小麦种植户的实证分析［J］. 中国农村观察, 2022(1): 107-125.
Zeng Jing, Li Jian, Qing Ping, et al. Does farmers adoption of biofortification crop technologies improve production performance? An empirical analysis based on wheat growers ［J］. China Rural Survey, 2022(1): 107-125.
［6］　吴萌, 任立, 甘臣林, 等. 城市近郊区农户土地投入行为绩效评价及障碍因子诊断——耕地多功能价值视角下的多群组对比分析［J］. 中国土地科学, 2020, 34(2): 37-45.Wu Meng, Ren Li, Gan Chenlin, et al. Performance evaluation and obstacle factor diagnosis of farmers land investment behavior in suburbs: a contrastive analysis based on MVCL ［J］ China Land Science, 2020, 34(2): 37-45.
［7］　刘畅, 吕杰, 付娆. 小农户嵌入现代农业的衔接模式及其绩效研究［J］. 农村经济, 2021(10): 119-126.
Liu Chang, Lü Jie, Fu Rao. Research on the connection mode and performance of small farmers embedding into modern agriculture ［J］. Rural Economy, 2021(10): 119-126.
［8］　吴雪莲, 张俊飚, 何可. 农户水稻秸秆还田技术采纳意愿及其驱动路径分析［J］. 资源科学, 2016, 38(11): 2117-2126.Wu Xuelian, Zhang Junbiao, He Ke. Farmer willingness to adopt rice straw returning technology and driving path　［J］. Resources Science, 2016, 38(11): 2117-2126
［9］　耿宇宁, 郑少锋, 刘婧. 农户绿色防控技术采纳的经济效应与环境效应评价——基于陕西省猕猴桃主产区的调查［J］. 科技管理研究, 2018, 38(2): 245-251.
Geng Yuning, Zheng Shaofeng, Liu Jing. The evaluation of economic and environmental effects of farmers integrated pest management technology adoption behavior: Based on the investigation in kiwi fruit main production areas of Shaanxi Province ［J］. Science and Technology Management Research, 2018, 38(2): 245-251.
［10］　马鹏超, 朱玉春. 设立村级河长提升农村水环境治理绩效了吗?——基于倾向得分匹配(PSM)的反事实估计［J］.南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 22(1): 149-159.
Ma Pengchao, Zhu Yuchun.Did the establishment of villagelevel river chief improve the performance of rural water environment governance? Based on the counterfactual estimation of the propensity score matching (PSM)［J］. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 22(1): 149-159.
［11］　许珍珍, 赵晓峰. 农业经营主体技术采纳行为差异化的实践形态、形成原因及其影响［J］. 中国科技论坛, 2022, 310(2): 178-188.
Xu Zhenzhen, Zhao Xiaofeng. Practical patterns, causes and implications of differentiated technology adoption behaviour of agricultural operators ［J］. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2022, 310(2): 178-188.
［12］　宾幕容, 文孔亮. 基于农户满意度的循环农业技术采纳的绩效研究——以畜禽养殖废弃物利用为例［J］. 江西社会科学, 2017, 37(9): 93-99.
Bin Murong, Wen Kongliang. Research on the performance of circular agriculture technology adoption based on farmers satisfaction: Taking the utilization of livestock and poultry farming waste as an example ［J］.Jiangxi Social Sciences, 2017, 37(9): 93-99.
［13］　孙若梅. 绿色农业生产: 化肥减量与有机肥替代进展评价［J］. 重庆社会科学, 2019(6): 33-43.
Sun Ruomei. Production of green agriculture: An evaluation of the process of reducing chemical fertilizer and replacing with organic fertilizer ［J］. Chongqing Social Sciences, 2019(6): 33-43.
［14］　刘莉, 刘静. 基于超越对数生产函数的有机肥与化肥替代弹性分析——来自渤海湾苹果主产区果农施肥行为调查［J］. 农业技术经济, 2022(8): 69-82.

Liu Li, Liu Jing. Analysis of substitution elasticity of organic fertilizer and chemical fertilizer based on trans—log production function: Investigation from the dominant apple producing areas in Bohai bay ［J］. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2022(8): 69-82.

［15］　陆泉志, 张益丰. 农户从测土配方施肥中获益了吗？——兼论测土配方施肥技术缘何“叫好不叫座”［J］. 农业经济与管理, 2023, 79(3): 48-58.
Lu Quanzhi, Zhang Yifeng. Have farmers benefited from soil testing and formulated fertilization? On the reason why soil testing and formulated fertilization is “widely acclaimed but not widely adopted” ［J］. Agricultural Economics and Management, 2023, 79(3): 48-58.
［16］　许玲燕, 张端端, 杜建国. 环境规制与新型农业经营主体绿色发展绩效——基于有调节的中介效应分析［J］. 中国农业资源与区划, 2023, 44(2): 77-88.
Xu Lingyan, Zhang Duanduan, Du Jianguo. Environmental regulation and green development performance of new agricultural operation entities: Based on moderated mediation effect analysis ［J］. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2023, 44(2): 77-88.
［17］　于艳丽, 李桦. 多主体协同治理下茶农绿色生产绩效［J］. 长江流域资源与环境, 2021, 30(9): 2299-2310.
Yu Yanli, Li Hua. Performance analysis of tea farmers green production under multiagent collaborative governance ［J］. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2021, 30(9): 2299-2310.
［18］　陈转青. 政策导向、市场导向对农户绿色生产的影响——基于河南865个农户的实证分析［J］. 管理学, 2021, 34(5): 109-125.
Chen Zhuanqing. The influence of policyorientation and marketorientation on farmers green production: Based on the empirical analysis of 865 farmers in Henan ［J］. Journal of Management, 2021, 34(5): 109-125.
［19］　王桂霞, 杨义风. 农户有机肥替代化肥技术采纳行为决定: 市场驱动还是政府激励?——基于农户分化视角［J］. 农村经济, 2021(4): 102-110.
Wang Guixia, Yang Yifeng. To make decision on adopting organic fertilizer instead of chemical fertilizer: Marketdriven or government incentives? ［J］. Rural Economy, 2021(4): 102-110.
［20］　张广斌, 马静, 徐华. 中国农田非CO2温室气体减排的研究现状与建议［J］. 中国科学院院刊, 2023, 38(3): 504-517.Zhang Guangbin, Ma Jing, Xu Hua. Status quo of research and suggestions on reduction of nonCO2 greenhouse gas emission from chinese farmland ［J］. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2023, 38(3): 504-517.
［21］　张露, 罗必良. 农业减量化：农户经营的规模逻辑及其证据［J］. 中国农村经济, 2020, 422(2): 81-99.
Zhang Lu, Luo Biliang. Agricultural chemical reduction: The logic and evidence based on farmland operation scale of households ［J］. China Rural Economy, 2020, 422(2): 81-99.