益贫视角下南疆深度贫困地区土地整治综合效益研究

doi:10.13733/j.jcam.issn.20955553.2022.05.027

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 土地整治是贫困地区激活自然资本的重要手段，也是扶贫开发工作的有力支撑，其扶贫成效已得到了地方的实践证明。以南疆深度贫困地区土地整治典型项目区为例，对研究区域土地整治综合效益的益贫性进行研究，运用匹配倍差法模型(PSM-DID)进行实证检验，对比分析土地整治实施前后、实施区域与未实施区域整治综合效益的益贫特性。研究结果表明，以DID、PSM、PSM-DID三种方法进行估算，结果均显示：实施土地整治项目对农户经营性收入、财产性收入有显著影响。其中，两类农户的户均经营性收入的匹配倍差估计值是963元、户均财产性收入的匹配倍差估计值为1 736元，且通过5%的显著性检验。其次，表征经济层面的是否流转土地的系数为0.142>0；同时，表征社会层面的居民点集约利用度的系数为0.012＞0、外出务工人员数的系数为0.142＞0，说明土地整治具有社会层面的益贫效应；表征生态层面的防护林密度变化率的系数为0.362＞0、土地垦殖变化率的系数为0.019＞0，因此，土地整治也具有生态层面的益贫效应。综合来看，土地整治目标受益群体即贫困地区农户的受益显著，土地整治综合效益的益贫性毋庸置疑。

关键词: 土地整治, 贫困地区, 综合效应, 益贫, PSM-DID模型

Abstract: Land consolidation is an important means to activate natural capital in povertystricken areas, as well as being a significant contributor to poverty alleviation efforts and development work. The poverty alleviation effect has been achieved through local practice in China. In this paper, a typical project area of land consolidation in the deeply povertystricken areas of Southern Xinjiang was taken as an example to study the povertyalleviation characteristics of the comprehensive benefits of land consolidation in the study area. The matched multiple difference model (PSM-DID) was used for empirical testing, and the povertyalleviation characteristics of the comprehensive benefits of land consolidation before and after the implementation of land consolidation, between the implemented area and the unimplemented area were compared and analyzed. The results showed that the land consolidation project had a significant impact on the farmers operating income and property income through estimation of DID, PSM and PSM-DID. Among them, the estimated value of the matching multiple difference of the average operating income per household of the two types of peasant households was 963 yuan, and the estimated value of the matching multiple difference of the average property income per household was 1 736 yuan, which passed the significance test of 5%. Secondly, the coefficient of whether the land was transferred at the economic level was 0.142>0. At the same time, the coefficient of intensive use of residential land at the social level was 0.012>0, and the coefficient of the number of migrant workers was 0.142>0, which indicated that land consolidation had a povertyalleviating effect at the social level. The change rate coefficient of shelterbelt density at the ecological level was 0.362>0, and the change rate coefficient of land reclamation was 0.019>0, indicating that land consolidation also had the benefit and poverty effect at the ecological level. On the whole, the target beneficiary groups of land consolidation, namely farmers in poor areas, benefit significantly, and the comprehensive benefits of land consolidation are undoubtedly beneficial to the poor.

Key words: land consolidation, poor areas, comprehensive effect, poverty alleviation, PSM-DID model

中图分类号:

F301.2

亚西尔·阿不力克木, 杨俊孝, 王雪菀. 益贫视角下南疆深度贫困地区土地整治综合效益研究[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2022, 43(5): 186-195.

Yaxier Abulikemu, Yang Junxiao, Wang Xuewan.. Comprehensive benefits of land remediation in povertystricken areas of Southern Xinjiang from the perspective of poverty alleviation[J]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2022, 43(5): 186-195.

参考文献

［1］姚建宗. 中国特色社会主义新时代法治建设的实践行动纲领——中国共产党十九大报告的法学解读［J］. 法制与社会发展, 2017, 23(6): 5-20.
Yao Jianzong. The practical action program of rule of law construction in socialism with Chinese characteristics for a new era: Legal reading of the report of the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China ［J］. Law and Social Development, 2017, 23(6): 5-20.
［2］任佳, 薛剑, 贾文涛. 扶贫开发, 土地整治如何“锦上添花”［J］. 中国土地, 2013(5): 56-58.
［3］张海. 贵州安顺市土地整治助推精准扶贫对策研究［J］. 西部资源, 2016(4): 186-187.
［4］黄建水, 尹素丽, 刘彬彬. 创新土地管理推进精准扶贫——河南省的实践与探索［J］. 中国土地, 2016(12): 38-39.
［5］王远燃, 刘强, 杨帆. 土地整治助推精准扶贫的实践与思考——以湖北省恩施自治州五县市为例［J］. 中国土地, 2017(10): 39-41.
［6］杨磊, 郧文聚, 左旭阳. 创新整治模式服务三农发展——广西高标准基本农田建设调研报告［J］. 中国发展, 2014, 14(3): 82-84.
Yang Lei, Yun Wenju, Zuo Xuyang. Innovation mode of land consolidation for serving agriculture, rural areas and farmers: A research report on wellfacilitied capital farmland construction in Guangxi ［J］. China Development, 2014, 14(3): 82-84.
［7］杨颖瑜. 广西喀斯特石山区土地整治与扶贫开发研究［A］. 中国自然资源学会土地资源研究专业委员会, 中国地理学会农业地理与乡村发展专业委员会. 中国农村土地整治与城乡协调发展研究［C］. 中国自然资源学会土地资源研究专业委员会, 中国地理学会农业地理与乡村发展专业委员会， 2012: 7.
［8］阮松涛, 吴克宁, 郑子敬. 中国土地扶贫的制度分析与政策探讨［J］. 国土资源科技管理, 2013, 30(5): 115-121.
Ruan Songtao, Wu Kening, Zheng Zijing. Chinese system and policy of land poverty alleviation ［J］. Scientific and Technological Management of Land and Resources, 2013, 30(5): 115-121.
［9］乔陆印. 乡村振兴视域下农村土地整治的内涵重构与系统特征［J］. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(22): 58-65.
Qiao Luyin. Connotation reconstruction and system characteristics of rural land consolidation from perspective of rural revitalization ［J］. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2019, 35(22): 58-65.
［10］夏玉莲, 匡远配. 农地流转的多维减贫效应分析——基于5省1218户农户的调查数据［J］. 中国农村经济, 2017(9): 44-61.
Xia Yulian, Kuang Yuanpei. Multidimensional poverty reduction effects of farmland transfer: An analysis based on data collected from 1218 farm households in five provinces ［J］. Chinese Rural Economy, 2017(9): 44-61.
［11］刘彦随, 周扬, 刘继来. 中国农村贫困化地域分异特征及其精准扶贫策略［J］. 中国科学院院刊, 2016, 31(3): 269-278.
Liu Yansui, Zhou Yang, Liu Jilai. Regional differentiation characteristics of rural poverty and targeted poverty alleviation strategy in China ［J］. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2016, 31(3): 269-278.
［12］李裕瑞, 曹智, 郑小玉, 等. 我国实施精准扶贫的区域模式与可持续途径［J］. 中国科学院院刊, 2016, 31(3): 279-288.
Li Yurui, Cao Zhi, Zheng Xiaoyu, et al. Regional and sustainable approach for targetpoverty alleviation and development of China ［J］. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2016, 31(3): 279-288.
［13］张雪松, 张茂茂, 王全喜, 等. 基于CW-GRAP模型的随州市土地整治综合效益评价［J］. 水土保持研究, 2019, 26(3): 318-324.
Zhang Xuesong, Zhang Maomao, Wang Quanxi, et al. Evaluation on the comprehensive benefit of land consolidation in Suizhou City based on CW-GRAP model ［J］. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 26(3): 318-324.
［14］田飞丽. 我国农村公共服务供给的减贫绩效研究［D］. 大连: 东北财经大学, 2014.
Tian Feili. Research on poverty reduction effect of rural public service supply in China ［D］. Dalian: Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, 2014.
［15］石峡. 土地整治公众参与机制研究［D］. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2015.
Shi Xia. Research on public participation mechanism of land consolidation ［D］. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2015.
［16］汪文雄, 冯彦飞, 张东丽, 等. 不同模式农地整治的减贫增收效应研究——基于匹配倍差法估计［J］. 中国土地科学, 2019, 33(12): 80-88.
Wang Wenxiong, Feng Yanfei, Zhang Dongli, et al. The povertyreducing and incomeincreasing effect of rural land consolidation in different modes based on the PSM-DID method ［J］. China Land Science, 2019, 33(12): 80-88.
［17］周燕, 吕轶凡. 中国制造业企业“走出去”的全要素生产率提升效应——基于倾向得分匹配和倍差法的再探讨［J］. 国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报), 2019(3): 124-141.
Zhou Yan, Lü Yifan. The promoting effect on the total factor productivity of Chinas manufacturing “Going Global” — A rediscussion based on PSM and DID methods ［J］. International Business, 2019(3): 124-141.
［18］刘心怡, 梁祎玲. 城乡一体化视角下新型城镇化的政策效果——基于倾向值匹配倍差法的检验［J］. 企业经济, 2018(1): 185-192.
［19］罗琼, 刘志成, 曹小衡. 国有企业民营化对企业出口的影响研究——基于倍差法的倾向评分匹配(DID-PSM)估计［J］. 现代财经(天津财经大学学报), 2016, 36(8): 67-78.
Luo Qiong, Liu Zhicheng, Cao Xiaoheng. Impact of SOE privatization on enterprise export the based on difference in difference propensity score matching method ［J］. Modern Finance and Economics (Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics), 2016, 36(8): 67-78.

[1]	张亚洲, 杨俊孝. 土地流转与农户贫困脆弱性研究——基于新疆南疆地区1 640户农户调查实证[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2022, 43(4): 198-205.
[2]	齐万里;杨俊孝;张亚洲;. 土地流转与农户减贫效应研究——基于新疆南疆地区1928户农户调查实证[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2021, 42(7): 215-221.
[3]	王静;. 贫困地区茶叶种植户技术吸纳对其生产技术选择行为影响分析——以贵州省茶叶主产区茶叶种植户为例[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2021, 42(1): 207-212.
[4]	陈梅;曹中华;. 丘陵山区宜机化土地整治项目综合效益评价研究——基于改进AHP—模糊综合评价法[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2019, 40(1): 145-151.