English

中国农机化学报

中国农机化学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (7): 135-140.DOI: 10.13733/j.jcam.issn.2095-5553.2024.07.020

• 农产品加工工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

简易保鲜储藏设备质量评价研究——以北京市为例

蒋晓1,禹振军2,盛顺2,卜小东1,贾利涛1,陈向东1   

  1. 1. 北京农业职业学院,北京市,102208; 2. 北京市农业机械试验鉴定推广站,北京市,100079
  • 出版日期:2024-07-15 发布日期:2024-06-21
  • 基金资助:
    北京市农业机械鉴定机构运行保障项目(2022072)

Research on quality evaluation of simple fresh-keeping storage equipment: Taking Beijing as an example 

Jiang Xiao1, Yu Zhenjun2, Sheng Shun2, Bu Xiaodong1, Jia Litao1, Chen Xiangdong1   

  1. 1. Beijing Vocational College of Agriculture, Beijing, 102208, China; 2. Beijing Agricultural Machinery
    Experiment Appraisal Extension Station, Beijing, 100079, China
  • Online:2024-07-15 Published:2024-06-21

摘要: 为实现简易保鲜储藏设备的推广应用,需要先确定简易保鲜储藏设备的质量评价方法。通过分析研究简易保鲜储藏设备质量调查评价方法并进行实际应用,对简易保鲜储藏设备的安全性、可靠性、适应性和售后服务状况等内容进行调查及评价,掌握在用保鲜储藏设备的整体质量水平。在分析研究简易保鲜储藏设备的组成结构、参数及功能原理、用途、设备实际运行使用过程中可能出现的状况及故障、用户使用设备的质量要求及服务感受的基础上,设置设备质量评价指标,每个指标赋予不同的权重系数。其中一级指标5个,分别是安全性、适用性、可靠性、物料使用负荷程度、售后服务;二级指标25个。一级指标中安全性25分、适用性20分、可靠性20分、物料使用负荷程度20分、售后服务15分。调查结果表明,简易保鲜储藏设备所有样本加权得分为83.10。3家公司的产品生产使用性能较好,达到产品设计标准。

关键词: 北京市, 简易保鲜储藏设备, 质量评价, 权重系数

Abstract:  In order to realize the popularization and application of simple preservation and storage equipment, it is necessary to determine the quality evaluation method of simple preservation and storage equipment. By analyzing and studying the quality investigation and evaluation method of simple preservation and storage equipment and carrying out practical application, the safety, reliability, adaptability and after-sales service status of simple preservation and storage equipment are investigated and evaluated, and the overall quality level of in-use preservation and storage equipment is mastered. Based on the analysis and study of the composition, parameters and functional principle of simple preservation and storage equipment, the possible conditions and faults in the actual operation and use of the equipment, the quality requirements of the user's use of the equipment and the service experience, the quality evaluation indicators of the equipment are set up, and each indicator is assigned a different weight coefficient. Among them, there are 5 first-level indicators, which are safety, applicability, reliability, material use load degree, after-sales service, and there are 25 secondary indicators. In the first level index, safety 25 points, applicability 20 points, reliability 20 points, material usage load 20 points, after-sales service 15 points. The results show that the weighted score of all samples of simple fresh-keeping storage equipment is 83.10. The production performance of the products of the three companies is good, and the product design standards are reached.

Key words: Beijing, simple fresh-keeping storage equipment, quality evaluation, weight coefficient

中图分类号: