农机制造企业供应商开发及其协同对供应商创新贡献的影响——基于认知评价理论

doi:10.13733/j.jcam.issn.2095-5553.2023.02.030

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 农业机械制造企业的技术创新离不开供应商的贡献。基于认知评价理论，探明农业机械制造企业不同形式供应商开发及其协同与供应商创新贡献之间的关系。通过SPSS软件进行层次回归分析以检验所提假设。来自170个有效样本的实证研究表明：农业机械制造企业采用不同形式的供应商开发对供应商创新贡献有不同影响，激励和直接参与正向影响供应商创新贡献，竞争压力负向影响供应商创新贡献。另外，激励和直接参与的协同更有利于供应商创新贡献的提升，而竞争压力和直接参与的协同不利于供应商创新贡献的提升，激励和竞争压力的协同对供应商创新贡献影响不显著。研究成果对我国农业机械制造企业的技术创新绩效提升有一定的实践参考价值

关键词: 农业机械制造企业, 供应商开发, 供应商创新贡献, 认知评价理论

Abstract: Technological innovation of agricultural machinery manufacturers cannot be separated from the contribution of suppliers. Based on the cognitive evaluation theory, the relationship between different forms of supplier development and its synergy and supplier innovation contribution in agricultural machinery manufacturing enterprises was explored. SPSS software was used for hierarchical regression analysis to test the hypothesis. The empirical study from 170 manufacturers shows that different forms of supplier development have different impacts on supplier innovation contribution, incentive and direct involvement positively affects supplier innovation contribution, and competitive pressure negatively affects supplier innovation contribution. In addition, the synergy of incentive and direct involvement is more conducive to the improvement of supplier innovation contribution, while the synergy of competitive pressure and direct involvement is not conducive to the improvement of supplier innovation contribution, and the synergy of incentive and competitive pressure has no significant impact on supplier innovation contribution. The research results have some practical reference value for improving the technological innovation performance of agricultural machinery manufacturers in China.

Key words: agricultural machinery manufacturer, supplier development, supplier innovation contribution, cognitive evaluation theory

付翔, 李勃. 农机制造企业供应商开发及其协同对供应商创新贡献的影响——基于认知评价理论[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2023, 44(2): 215-221.

参考文献

［1］　
李勃, 和征, 李随成. 供应商参与新产品开发中制造商可信的形成与影响:基于期望理论［J］. 研究与发展管理, 2017, 29(3): 53-63.

Li Bo, He Zheng, Li Suicheng. Manufacturer trustworthiness formation and its effect in supplier involvement into new product development: Expectancy theoretic perspective ［J］. R & D Management, 2017, 29(3): 53-63.

［2］　
Sheng S, Zhou K Z, Li J J, et al. Institutions and opportunism in buyersupplier exchanges: The moderated mediating effects of contractual and relational governance ［J］. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2018, 46(6): 1014-1031.

［3］　
Poppo L, Zenger T. Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? ［J］. Strategic Management Journal, 2002, 23(8): 707-725.

［4］　
Benton Jr W C, Prahinski C, Fan Y. The influence of supplier development programs on supplier performance ［J］. International Journal of Production Economics, 2020, 230: 107793.

［5］　
Saghiri S, Wilding R. On the effectiveness of supplier development programs: The role of supplyside moderators ［J］. Technovation, 2021, 103(6): 102234.

［6］　
Yadlapalli A, Rahman S, Gunasekaran A. Socially responsible governance mechanisms for manufacturing firms in apparel supply chains ［J］. International Journal of Production Economics, 2018, 196: 135-149.

［7］　
Tran P N T, Gorton M, Lemke F. When supplier development initiatives fail: Identifying the causes of opportunism and unexpected outcomes ［J］. Journal of Business Research, 2021, 127: 277-289.

［8］　
Clauss T, Bouncken R B. Social power as an antecedence of governance in buyersupplier alliances ［J］. Industrial Marketing Management, 2019, 77: 75-89.

［9］　
Rummel A, Feinberg R. Cognitive evaluation theory: A metaanalytic review of the literature ［J］. Social Behavior and Personality, 1988, 16(2): 147-164.

［10］　
Deci E L, Ryan R M. The empirical exploration of intrinsic motivational processes ［J］. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1980, 13(08): 39-80.

［11］　
Chae S, Choi T Y, Hur D. Buyer power and supplier relationship commitment: A cognitive evaluation theory perspective ［J］. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2017, 53(2): 39-60.

［12］　
Modi S B, Mabert V A. Supplier development: Improving supplier performance through knowledge transfer ［J］. Journal of Operations Management, 2007, 25(1): 42-64.

［13］　
Terpend R, Krause D R. Competition or cooperation? Promoting supplier performance with incentives under varying conditions of dependence ［J］. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2015, 51(4): 29-53.

［14］　
Ryan R M, Deci E L. Selfdetermination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and wellbeing ［J］. American Psychologist, 2000, 55(1): 68.

［15］　
Saghiri S S, Mirzabeiki V. Buyerled environmental supplier development: Can suppliers really help it? ［J］. International Journal of Production Economics, 2021, 233: 107969.

［16］　
Shahzad K, I Sillanp, E Sillanp, et al. Benchmarking supplier development: An empirical case study of validating a framework to improve buyersupplier relationship ［J］. Management and Production Engineering Review, 2016, 7(1): 56-70.

［17］　
Liu L, Zhang M, Hendry L C, et al. Supplier development practices for sustainability: A multistakeholder perspective ［J］. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2018, 27(1): 100-116.

［18］　
Lee V H, Ooi K B, Loong A C Y, et al. The effects of supply chain management on technological innovation: The mediating role of guanxi ［J］. International Journal of Production Economics, 2018, 205.

［19］　
Lawson B, D Krause, Potter A. Improving supplier new product development performance: The role of supplier development ［J］. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2015, 32(5): 777-792.

［20］　
Stone D N, Deci E L, Ryan R M. Beyond talk: Creating autonomous motivation through selfdetermination theory ［J］. Journal of General Management, 2009, 34(3): 75-91.

［21］　
Finkelstein S R, Fishbach A. Tell me what I did wrong: Experts seek and respond to negative feedback ［J］. Journal of Consumer Research, 2012, 39(1): 22-38.

［22］　
Zhao X, Huo B, Flynn B B, et al. The impact of power and relationship commitment on the integration between manufacturers and customers in a supply chain ［J］. Journal of Operations Management, 2008, 26(3): 368-388.

［23］　
Handley S M, Benton Jr W C. Mediated power and outsourcing relationships ［J］. Journal of Operations Management, 2012, 30(3): 253-267.

［24］　
Nagati H, Rebolledo C. Supplier development efforts: The suppliers point of view ［J］. Industrial Marketing Management, 2013, 42(2): 180-188.

［25］　
Krause D R, Scannell T V. Supplier development practices: Productand servicebased industry comparisons ［J］. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2002, 38(1): 13-21.

［26］　
李娜, 李随成, 崔贺珵. 供应商创新性的利用机制:企业网络化行为的作用［J］. 南开管理评论, 2018, 21(1): 39-53.

Li Na, Li Suicheng, Cui Hecheng. The integration mechanism of supplier innovativeness: the role of firm networking behaviors ［J］.Nankai Business Review, 2018, 21(1): 39-53.

［27］　
Li S, Wu M, Zhu M. Whats in it for me? The occurrence of supplier innovation contribution in the context of supplierdominant innovation: The suppliers perspective ［J］. Industrial Marketing Management, 2022, 104: 182-195.

［28］　
Zhang Q, Jin J L, Yang D. How to enhance supplier performance in China: Interplay of contracts, relational governance and legal development ［J］. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2020, 40(6): 777-808.

［29］　
李勃, 和征, 李随成. 供应商参与绿色产品创新中的权力组合策略研究——基于资源动员视角［J］. 研究与发展管理, 2020, 32(4): 84-96.

Li Bo, He Zheng, Li Suicheng. Power mix strategy of supplier involvement into green product innovation: From the perspective of the resource mobilization ［J］. R & D Management, 2020, 32(4): 84-96.

［30］　
任之光, 高鹏斌. 双向开放式创新及其协同, 商业模式和企业创新绩效的关系研究［J］. 管理评论, 2020, 32(8): 116-130.

Ren Zhiguang, Gao Pengbin. A study on the relationship among twoway open innovation and their synergy, business model and firm innovation performance ［J］. Management Review, 2020, 32(8): 116-130.