草原补奖政策下牧户绿色生产意愿与行为悖离研究——以新疆昭苏县为例

doi:10.13733/j.jcam.issn.2095-5553.2024.04.043

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 畜牧业是关系国计民生的重要支柱产业，促进畜牧业绿色发展是今后农牧业供给侧结构性改革、农牧业高质量发展、乡村振兴战略的着力点与主攻方向。在新一轮草原补奖政策实施背景下，基于新疆昭苏县277个牧户调查数据，运用LogisticISM模型探索影响牧户绿色生产意愿与行为悖离的显著性因素及其层次结构。结果表明：57%的样本牧户绿色生产意愿与行为发生悖离；性别、受教育程度、草场规模、牧业收入、草原补奖政策认知、经济效益认知、技术可获得性、补贴发放及时度及牧业生态基础设施等因素对牧户绿色生产意愿与行为悖离存在显著影响；进一步剖析影响因素间层级结构后发现，性别、受教育程度、草场规模和补贴发放及时度是深层根源因素，牧业收入、技术可获得性是中层间接因素，而草原补奖政策认知、经济效益认知及牧业生态基础设施是表层直接因素。据此提出加强政策宣传与扶持力度；增强牧户绿色生产意识，激发牧户绿色生产的内生动力；强化绿色科技支撑，提供专业技术指导；完善牧业配套设施，改善外源约束性条件等建议，以期促使牧户绿色生产意愿转换为实际行为，实现绿色兴牧、畜牧业绿色高质量发展的目标。

关键词: 农业绿色生产, 意愿与行为悖离, 牧户, 草原补奖政策

Abstract: Animal husbandry is an important pillar industry related to the national economy and peoples livelihood. Promoting the green development of animal husbandry is the focus and main direction of the future supplyside structural reform of agriculture and animal husbandry, highquality development of agriculture and animal husbandry, and rural revitalization strategies. Under the background of the implementation of the new round of grassland compensation policy, based on the survey data of 277 herdsmen in Zhaosu County, Xinjiang, the LogisticISM model was used to explore the significant factors affecting herdsmens green production willingness and behavioral deviation, as well as the correlation and hierarchical structure of the factors. The results showed that 57% of the sample herdsmens green production intentions and behaviors were diverged. Factors such as gender, education level, grassland size, animal husbandry income, recognition of grassland reward policy, economic benefit recognition, technology availability, subsidies distribution timeliness and animal husbandry ecological infrastructure had a significant impact on herdsmens green production willingness and behavioral deviation. After further analysis of the logical hierarchy among the influencing factors, it was found that gender, education level, grassland size and subsidy distribution timeliness were the most important deep root factors, animal husbandry income and technology availability were the indirect factors at the middle level, while the recognition of grassland compensation policy, economic benefit and animal husbandry ecological infrastructure were the direct factors at the surface. On this basis, it is proposed to strengthen policy publicity and support, enhance the green production awareness of herdsmen, and stimulate the endogenous power of herdsmens green production, strengthen green technology support and provide professional technical guidance, improve animal husbandry supporting facilities and improve external constraints, so as to promote the conversion of green production intentions of herdsmen into actual behaviors, and realize the goal of green animal husbandry and green highquality development of animal husbandry.

Key words: agricultural green production, willingness and behavior divergence, herdsmen, grassland subsidy and reward policy

中图分类号:

F326.3

李淑敏, 苏向辉, 马瑛, 林文姬, 赵和萍. 草原补奖政策下牧户绿色生产意愿与行为悖离研究——以新疆昭苏县为例[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2024, 45(4): 311-320.

Li Shumin, Su Xianghui, Ma Ying, Lin Wenji, Zhao Heping. Research on the deviation of green production intention and behavior of herdsmen under the context of grassland subsidy and reward policy: Taking Zhaosu County, Xinjiang as an example[J]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2024, 45(4): 311-320.

参考文献

［1］　尹晓青. 我国畜牧业绿色转型发展政策及现实例证［J］. 重庆社会科学, 2019(3): 18-30.
Yin Xiaoqing. Policies and practical examples of transition and green development of animal husbandry in China ［J］. Chongqing Social Sciences, 2019(3): 18-30.
［2］　杨福霞, 郑欣. 价值感知视角下生态补偿方式对农户绿色生产行为的影响［J］.中国人口·资源与环境, 2021, 31(4): 164-171.
Yang Fuxia, Zheng Xin. Impact of ecological compensation methods on farmers green production behaviors from the perspective of value perception ［J］. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2021, 31(4): 164-171.
［3］　李志东, 刘某承. 我国草原生态保护补助奖励政策效应评价研究进展［J］. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1125-1135.
Li Zhidong, Liu Moucheng. Research progress in the evaluation of the policy of subsidy and reward for grassland ecological protection in China ［J］. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1125-1135.
［4］　谭永风, 张淑霞, 陆迁. 环境规制、技术选择与养殖户绿色生产转型——基于内生转换回归模型的实证分析［J］. 干旱区资源与环境, 2021, 35(10): 69-76.
Tan Yongfeng, Zhang Shuxia, Lu Qian. Environmental regulation, technology selection and farmers green production transition: Empirical analysis based on endogenous transformation regression model ［J］. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2021, 35(10): 69-76.
［5］　石志恒, 张可馨. 农户绿色生产“强意愿弱行为”的再审视:基于资源约束和社会规范视角——以个人规范为中介变量［J］. 中国农业资源与区划, 2022, 43(8): 43-54.
Shi Zhiheng, Zhang Kexin. Reexamination of “strong will and weak behavior” of farmers green production: From the perspective of resource constraints and social normswith personal norms as mediating variables ［J］. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2022, 43(8): 43-54.
［6］　陈银蓉, 王晓妹, 梅昀. 基于LogitISM模型的农户耕地保护意愿与行为的悖离研究——以武汉城市圈为例［J］. 长江流域资源与环境, 2022, 31(4): 927-936.
Chen Yinrong, Wang Xiaomei, Mei Yun. Study on farmers cultivated land protection willingness and behavior paradox using Logit and interpretive structural model: Example from Wuhan metropolitan area ［J］. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2022, 31(4): 927-936.
［7］　李福夺, 尹昌斌. 农户绿肥种植意愿与行为悖离发生机制研究——基于湘、赣、桂、皖、豫五省(区)854户农户的调查［J］. 当代经济管理, 2021, 43(1): 59-67.
Li Fuduo, Yin Changbin. Occurrence mechanism of the deviation of farmers willingness and behavior to plant with green manure: Based on a survey of 854 farmers in five provinces of Hunan, Jiangxi, Guangxi, Anhui and Henan ［J］. Contemporary Economic Management, 2021, 43(1): 59-67.
［8］　潘生亮. 新疆奶牛养殖户绿色养殖技术采纳意愿及其行为研究［D］. 阿拉尔: 塔里木大学, 2022.
Pan Shengliang. The willingness and behavior of dairy farmers to adopt green breeding technology in Xinjiang ［D］. Alar: Tarim University, 2022.
［9］　刘艳婷, 陈美球, 谢贤鑫. 江西省农户生态耕种采纳意愿与行为悖离研究［J］. 地域研究与开发, 2021, 40(2): 118-123.
Liu Yanting, Chen Meiqiu, Xie Xianxin. Study on deviation between farmers willingness to adopt ecological farming and their behaviors of Jiangxi Province ［J］. Areal Research and Development, 2021, 40(2): 118-123.
［10］　郭利京, 赵瑾. 认知冲突视角下农户生物农药施用意愿研究——基于江苏639户稻农的实证［J］. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 17(2): 123-133.
Guo Lijing, Zhao Jin. Study on farmers willingness of biological pesticide application from the perspective of cognitive conflict: An empirical analysis based on 639 rice farmers in Jiangsu ［J］. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 2017, 17(2): 123-133.
［11］　郭清卉, 李昊, 李世平, 等. 基于行为与意愿悖离视角的农户亲环境行为研究——以有机肥施用为例［J］. 长江流域资源与环境, 2021, 30(1): 212-224.
Guo Qinghui, Li Hao, Li Shiping, et al. Research on farmers proenvironmental behavior from the perspective of paradox existing between behavior and willingness: Taking the organic fertilizers application as an example ［J］. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2021, 30(1): 212-224.
［12］　赵艺华, 周宏. 社会信任、奖惩政策能促进农户参与农药包装废弃物回收吗?［J］. 干旱区资源与环境, 2021, 35(4): 17-23.
Zhao Yihua, Zhou Hong. Can social trust and policy of reward and punishment farmers participation in the recycling of pesticide packaging waste? ［J］. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2021, 35(4): 17-23.
［13］　石志恒, 符越. 技术扩散条件视角下农户绿色生产意愿与行为悖离研究——以无公害农药技术采纳为例［J］.农林经济管理学报, 2022, 21(1): 29-39.
Shi Zhiheng, Fu Yue. Contradiction between green production intention and farmers behavior from the perspective of technology diffusion conditions: Taking adoption of pollutionfree pesticide technology as an example ［J］. Journal of AgroForestry Economics and Management, 2022, 21(1): 29-39.
［14］　丁晨, 廖思雨, 任莹, 等. 多重约束下茶农绿色生产“强意愿弱行为”研究［J］. 现代营销(下旬刊), 2022(5): 52-55.Ding Chen, Liao Siyu, Ren Ying, et al. Research on “Strong Will and Weak Behavior” in green production of tea farmers under multiple constraints ［J］. Modern Marketing (Latest Issue), 2022(5): 52-55.
［15］　余威震, 罗小锋, 李容容, 等. 绿色认知视角下农户绿色技术采纳意愿与行为悖离研究［J］. 资源科学, 2017, 39(8): 1573-1583.
Yu Weizhen, Luo Xiaofeng, Li Rongrong, et al. The paradox between farmer willingness and their adoption of green technology from the perspective of green cognition ［J］. Resource Science, 2017, 39(8): 1573-1583.
［16］　郭利京, 王颖. 农户生物农药施用为何“说一套,做一套”?［J］. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018(4): 71-80, 169.
Guo Lijing, Wang Ying. Why farmers “say one thing and do another” in the application of biological pesticide?［J］. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 2018(4): 71-80, 169.
［17］　郅建功, 颜廷武, 杨国磊. 家庭禀赋视域下农户秸秆还田意愿与行为悖离研究——兼论生态认知的调节效应［J］. 农业现代化研究, 2020, 41(6): 999-1010.
Zhi Jiangong, Yan Tingwu, Yang Guolei. The paradox between farmers willingness and their behaviors of strawreturntofield practice from the perspective of family endowment and the analysis of the moderating effects of farmers ecological cognition ［J］. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2020, 41(6): 999-1010.
［18］　吴雪莲. 农户绿色农业技术采纳行为及政策激励研究［D］. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2016.
Wu Xuelian. Research on farmers green agricultural technology adoption behavior and policy incentives ［D］. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2016.
［19］　马良灿. 理性小农抑或生存小农——实体小农学派对形式小农学派的批判与反思［J］. 社会科学战线, 2014(4): 165-172.Ma Liangcan. Rational small peasants or survival small peasants: Criticism and reflection on formal small peasants from the entity small peasants school ［J］. Social Science Front, 2014(4): 165-172.
［20］　许佳彬, 王洋, 李翠霞. 户有机肥施用意愿与行为悖离原因何在——基于对黑龙江省的调查［J］. 农业现代化研究, 2021, 42(3): 474-485.
Xu Jiabin, Wang Yang, Li Cuixia. Reasons behind the paradox between farmers willingness and their behaviors of applying organic fertilizer: A case study of Heilongjiang Province ［J］. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2021, 42(3): 474-485.
［21］　费红梅, 刘文明, 姜会明. 保护性耕作技术采纳意愿及群体差异性分析［J］. 农村经济, 2019(4): 122-129.Fei Hongmei, Liu Wenming, Jiang Huiming. Willingness to adopt conservation tillage technology and analysis of group differences ［J］. Rural Economy, 2019(4): 122-129.
［22］　刘起, 余国新. 农户认知与外部环境对有机肥施用行为的影响研究［J］. 南方农机, 2022, 53(2): 42-44.Liu Qi, Yu Guoxin. Research on the influence of farmer cognition and external environment on organic fertilizer application behavior ［J］. Nanfang Agricultural Machinery, 2022, 53(2): 42-44.
［23］　王霞, 吕剑平, 兰娜. 农户“粮改饲”参与行为与意愿悖离研究——基于甘肃354位农户的微观数据［J］. 中国农机化学报, 2022, 43(2): 221-228.
Wang Xia, Lü Jianping, Lan Na. Study of farmers participation behaviors and willingness deviation in “Foodfodder Change” replacement: Based on the microdata from 354 farmers in Gansu Province ［J］. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2022, 43(2): 221-228.
［24］　姜利娜, 赵霞. 农户绿色农药购买意愿与行为的悖离研究——基于5省863个分散农户的调研数据［J］. 中国农业大学学报, 2017, 22(5): 163-173.
Jiang Lina, Zhao Xia. A study on paradox between farmers purchasing willingness and purchasing behavior of green pesticides: Based on 863 farmers survey data from five provinces in China ［J］. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2017, 22(5): 163-173.
［25］　黄炎忠, 罗小锋, 李容容, 等. 农户认知、外部环境与绿色农业生产意愿——基于湖北省632个农户调研数据［J］. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(3): 680-687.
Huang Yanzhong, Luo Xiaofeng, Li Rongrong, et al. Farmer cognition, external environment and willingness of green agriculture production based on the survey data of 632 farmers in Hubei Province ［J］. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2018, 27(3): 680-687.
［26］　陈雪婷, 冯中朝, 黄炜虹, 等. 经营规模对农户异质性生态生产行为的影响研究［J］. 长江流域资源与环境, 2021, 30(5): 1252-1263.
Chen Xueting, Feng Zhongchao, Huang Weihong, et al. Study on the impact of operation scale on farmers heterogeneous ecological production behavior ［J］. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2021, 30(5): 1252-1263.
［27］　周勋章, 邵红岭, 杜英娜, 等. 农业环境规制情境下绿色认知对家庭农场主绿色生产行为影响——基于我国中部地区家庭农场的调查［J］. 河北农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(3): 32-43.
Zhou Xunzhang, Shao Hongling, Du Yingna, et al. Green cognition on family farmers green production behavior in the context of agricultural environmental regulations and policies: Based on the survey of family farmers in central China ［J］. Journal of Hebei Agricultural University (Social Sciences), 2022, 24(3): 32-43.
［28］　贺志武, 胡伦, 陆迁. 农户风险偏好、风险认知对节水灌溉技术采用意愿的影响［J］. 资源科学, 2018, 40(4): 797-808.
He Zhiwu, Hu Lun, Lu Qian. Influence of farmers risk preference and risk perception on watersaving irrigation technology adoption ［J］. Resources Science, 2018, 40(4): 797-808.
［29］　陈吉平. 农业绿色生产行为的内涵与外延［J］. 新疆农垦经济, 2020(3): 24-30.
Chen Jiping. Connotation and extension of agricultural green production behavior ［J］. Xinjiang State Farms Economy, 2020(3): 24-30.
［30］　赵和萍, 苏向辉, 马瑛, 等. 情理整合视域下干旱区农户亲环境行为与意愿悖离研究［J］. 干旱区资源与环境, 2021, 35(11): 89-96.
Zhao Heping, Su Xianghui, Ma Ying, et al. Paradox between farmers proenvironmental behaviors and willingness in arid areas from the perspective of integration of sentiment and reason［J］. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2021, 35(11): 89-96.
［31］　汪应洛. 系统工程［M］. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2015.
［32］　胡乃娟, 孙晓玲, 许雅婷, 等. 基于LogisticISM模型的农户有机肥施用行为影响因素及层次结构分解［J］. 资源科学, 2019, 41(6): 1120-1130.
Hu Naijuan, Sun Xiaoling, Xu Yating, et al. Influencing factors of farmers organic fertilizer application behavior and their stratification based on LogisticISM model ［J］. Resources Science, 2019, 41(6): 1120-1130.
［33］　杜红梅, 周健. 生猪养殖户粪污资源化利用意愿与行为一致性研究［J］. 湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 23(2): 92-102.
Du Hongmei, Zhou Jian. A study on the consistency of pig farmers intention and behavior of waste resources utilization ［J］. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Social Sciences), 2022, 23(2): 92-102.

[1]	颜光耀, 陈卫洪, , 钱海慧. 畜牧业机械化对畜牧业产出的影响[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2023, 44(11): 239-249.
[2]	豆志杰, 钟明艳, 孟飒. 区域畜禽养殖环境承载力评价及预警研究[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2021, 42(12): 214-221.
[3]	豆志杰;钟明艳;. 基于耕地污染负荷的畜禽养殖业空间布局优化研究[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2021, 42(4): 150-156.