Effect of different technology supply channels on farmers' satisfaction with adopting pest control technology: Based on survey data of 405 rice farmers in Jiangsu Province

doi:10.13733/j.jcam.issn.2095‑5553.2025.02.016

Abstract

Abstract: In order to explore the impact of different technology supply channels on farmers' adoption of pest control technology and improve farmers' satisfaction with pest control technology, based on the survey data of 405 rice farmers in Jiangsu Province, the binary Probit model was used for an empirical analysis. Binary Logit model and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to test robustness and solve sample selection bias. The research showed that, first of all, the pest control technology provided by different technology supply channels could positively and significantly affect farmers' satisfaction with pest control technology to different degrees. Secondly, technology supply channels of different nature had a significant positive impact on farmers' satisfaction with pest control technology at the level of 1%, and the marginal effect of business technology supply was greater than that of public service technology supply. Thirdly, among the control variables, it was found that health status and agricultural technical training had significant positive effects on farmers' satisfaction in adopting pest control technology. The age of farmers and the number of cultivated land had a significant negative effect on the satisfaction of farmers. Finally, it is proposed to accelerate the construction of a diversified agricultural technology extension system with public welfare agricultural technology extension institutions as the leading and management subjects as the supplement. Institutions such as scientific research institutes and universities are strongly encouraged to establish contacts with farmers and change the top‑down agricultural technology popularization method.

Key words: farmer satisfaction, technology supply channels, pest control technology, Binary Probit model, Binary Logit model, Propensity Score Matching(PSM)

摘要： 为探究不同技术供给渠道对农户采纳病虫害防治技术的影响，提高农户病虫害防治技术满意度，基于江苏省405户水稻种植户调研数据，运用二元Probit模型进行实证分析，利用二元Logit模型、倾向得分匹配法(PSM)进行稳健性检验和解决样本选择偏差问题。研究表明，首先，不同技术供给渠道提供的病虫害防治技术均能在不同程度上正向显著影响农户对病虫害防治技术的满意度；其次，不同性质的技术供给渠道均在1%的水平上显著正向影响农户病虫害防治技术满意度，并且经营型技术供给比公益型技术供给所带来的边际效应更大；再次，控制变量中发现，健康状况、农业技术培训均显著正向影响农户采纳病虫害防治技术满意度；农户的年龄、耕地块数均显著负向影响农户满意度。最后，提出要加快构建以公益型农技推广机构为主导，经营型主体为补充的多元化的农业技术推广体系；大力鼓励高校科研院所等机构建立与农户之间的联系，改变自上而下的农业技术推广方式。

关键词: 农户满意度, 技术供给渠道, 病虫害防治技术, 二元Probit模型, 二元Logit模型, 倾向得分匹配法(PSM)

CLC Number:

F323.3
S-9

Xi Zhixin, Yu Degui, Yao Jingshu, Tian Suyan. Effect of different technology supply channels on farmers' satisfaction with adopting pest control technology: Based on survey data of 405 rice farmers in Jiangsu Province[J]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2025, 46(2): 105-112.

隰志欣, 余德贵, 姚菁舒, 田素妍. 不同技术供给渠道对农户病虫害防治技术采纳满意度影响——基于江苏省405份水稻种植户调查数据[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2025, 46(2): 105-112.

References

[ 1 ] 葛磊, 陆建飞, 徐春春. 关于推进江苏水稻产业绿色高质量发展的思考[J]. 中国稻米, 2020, 26(6): 71-75.
Ge Lei, Lu Jianfei, Xu Chunchun. Thoughts on promoting green and high‑quality development of Jiangsu rice industry [J]. China Rice, 2019, 26(6): 71-75.
[ 2 ] 袁若兰, 廖文梅, 邱海兰. 农业技术培训、经营规模对农业生产效率的影响——以水稻栽培技术为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2023(7): 216-226.
Yuan Ruolan, Liao Wenmei, Qiu Hailan. Research on the influence of agricultural technology training and management scale on agricultural production efficiency: Taking rice cultivation technology as an example [J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2023(7): 216-226.
[ 3 ] 杨志海. 老龄化、社会网络与农户绿色生产技术采纳行为——来自长江流域六省农户数据的验证[J]. 中国农村观察, 2018, 142(4): 44-58.
[ 4 ] 潘丹. 农业技术培训对农村居民收入的影响: 基于倾向得分匹配法的研究[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 14(5): 62-69.
Pan Dan. Income returns on agro‑technical training: Evidence from propensity‑score matching [J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 14(5): 62-69.
[ 5 ] 王学婷, 张俊飚, 童庆蒙. 参与农业技术培训能否促进农户实施绿色生产行为?——基于家庭禀赋视角的ESR模型分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2021, 30(1): 202-211.
Wang Xueting, Zhang Junbiao, Tong Qingmeng. Can participating in agricultural technology training promote farmers to implement green production behavior? Based on the analysis of family endowment and ESR model [J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2021, 30(1): 202-211.
[ 6 ] 张永强, 严远荣. 农户IPM技术采纳行为影响因素研究——基于黑龙江省稻农调查数据的实证[J]. 东北农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 19(2): 57-68.
Zhang Yongqiang, Yan Yuanrong. Study on the influencing factors of farmer' IPM technology adoption behavior: Empirical Study Based on survey data of rice farmers in Heilongjiang Province [J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University: Social Science Edition, 2019, 19(2): 57-68.
[ 7 ] 丁翔, 李世平, 南灵, 等. 社会学习、环境认知对农户亲环境行为影响研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2021, 35(2): 34-40.
Ding Xiang, Li Shiping, Nan Ling, et al. Impact of social learning and environmental cognition on farmers' pro‑environmental behavior [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2021, 35(2): 34-40.
[ 8 ] 罗磊, 罗晨豪, 刘宇荧, 等. 异质性视角下农户绿色生产技术采纳行为研究——基于四川省836份柑橘农户的调查数据[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2023(4): 172-183.
Luo Lei, Luo Chenhao, Liu Yuying, et al. Study of green production technology adoption behavior of farmers from the perspective of the heterogeneity: Based on the survey data of 836 citrus farmers in Sichuan province [J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2023(4): 172-183.
[ 9 ] 曹铁毅, 王雪琪, 邹伟. 经营规模、农业技术培训与家庭农场收入——基于江苏省的调查[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2020, 41(2): 237-244.
[10] 张晖, 张雨萌. 农业补贴提高了粮食生产技术效率吗？——基于江苏省552户粮食生产型家庭农场数据的实证研究[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 162(6): 58-67.
Zhang Hui, Zhang Yumeng. Does agricultural subsidy improve technical efficiency of grain production?: An empirical study based on the data of 552 grain production family farms in Jiangsu Province [J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 162(6): 58-67.
[11] 畅华仪, 张俊飚, 何可. 技术感知对农户生物农药采用行为的影响研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(1): 202-211.
Chang Huayi, Zhang Junbiao, He Ke. Technology perception and biological pesticides adoption [J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2019, 28(1): 202-211.
[12] 高启杰, 姚云浩, 马力. 多元农业技术推广组织合作的动力机制[J]. 华南农业大学学报 (社会科学版), 2015, 14(1): 1-7.
Gao Qijie, Yao Yunhao, Ma Li. On the motivation mechanism of cooperative agricultural technology extension [J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 2015, 14(1): 1-7.
[13] Fujun W, Zhou Y, Yinggang O, et al. “Government‑industry‑university‑research‑promotion” collaborative innovation mechanism construction to promote the development of agricultural machinery technology [J]. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2018, 51(17): 552-559.
[14] 崔民, 张济舟, 夏显力. 参与培训对农户生态农业技术采纳行为的影响——基于生态认知的中介效应和遮掩效应[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2021, 35(11): 38-46.
Cui Min, Zhang Jizhou, Xia Xianli. Effect of training on farmer's adoption of eco agricultural technology: The intermediary effect and masking effect [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2021, 35(11): 38-46.
[15] 杨子, 饶芳萍, 诸培新. 农业社会化服务对土地规模经营的影响——基于农户土地转入视角的实证分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2019, 411(3): 82-95.
Yang Zi, Rao Fangping, Zhu Peixin. The impact of specialized agricultural services on land scale management: An empirical analysis from the perspective of farmers' land transfer‑in [J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2019, 411(3): 82-95.
[16] 刘丽萍, 孙炜琳, 刘丽, 等. 异质性农技培训主体对农户绿色农业技术采纳行为的影响研究[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2023(4): 162-171.
Liu Liping, Sun Weilin, Liu Li, et al. Study on the influence of heterogeneous agricultural training subjects on farmers' green agricultural technology adoption behavior [J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2023(4): 162-171.
[17] 莫雪香, 徐锦玲, 李丛希, 等. 广东基层农业技术推广机构发展存在的问题与对策——基于激励机制视角[J]. 南方农村, 2022, 38(6): 12-16, 25.
[18] 杨宜婷, 陈昭玖, 钟菁. 农业技术推广政策满意度影响因素分析——以江西省种稻大户为例[J]. 江西农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2012, 11(3): 23-29.
Yang Yiting, Chen Zhaojiu, Zhong Jing. Factors affecting farmers' satisfaction with agriculture technology promotion policy: A study based on Jiangxi Province [J]. Journal of Jianxi Agricultural University: Social Sciences Edition, 2012, 11(3): 23-29.
[19] 张童朝, 颜廷武, 何可, 等. 资本禀赋对农户绿色生产投资意愿的影响——以秸秆还田为例[J]. 中国人口资源与环境, 2017, 27(8): 78-89.
Zhang Tongchao, Yan Tingwu, He Ke, et al. Impact of capital endowment on peasants' willingness to invest in green production: Taking crop straw returning to the field as an example [J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2017, 27(8): 78-89.
[20] Zhang Y, Long H, Li Y, et al. How does off‑farm work affect chemical fertilizer application? Evidence from China's mountainous and plain areas [J]. Land Use Policy, 2020, 99: 104848.
[21] 陈俊红, 田有国, 龚晶, 等. 我国农业技术推广主体的行为实践研究[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2018, 39(4): 567-575.
Chen Junhong, Tian Youguo, Gong Jing, et al. The practical behaviors of agro‑technical extension agencies in China [J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2018, 39(4): 567-575.