English

中国农机化学报

中国农机化学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (8): 344-352.DOI: 10.13733/j.jcam.issn.2095‑5553.2024.08.050

• 农业机械化综合研究 • 上一篇    

风险偏好、风险感知对新疆棉农低碳生产行为影响

李荣耀,刘国勇   

  • 出版日期:2024-08-15 发布日期:2024-07-26
  • 基金资助:
    新疆维吾尔自治区研究生科研创新项目(XJ2022G148)

Impact of risk preference and risk perception on low carbon production behavior of cotton farmers in Xinjiang

Li Rongyao, Liu Guoyong   

  • Online:2024-08-15 Published:2024-07-26

摘要: 完善风险管理、引导农户低碳生产是促进农业绿色低碳转型的关键。利用新疆289户棉农调研数据,运用Ordered Probit模型从低碳生产技术的风险和异质性视角实证分析风险偏好、风险感知对棉农低碳生产行为的影响。研究发现:样本棉农的低碳生产行为均值为5.443,处于中等采纳水平。风险偏好在1%水平上显著正向影响棉农低碳生产行为,风险感知在1%水平上显著负向影响棉农低碳生产行为,且在风险偏好与低碳生产行为间起显著负向调节作用。风险偏好和风险感知在异质性棉农中的作用差异较大。风险偏好对高文化程度和高种植经验棉农低碳技术采纳数量的影响更大,风险感知对低文化程度、低种植经验和非兼业棉农的低碳生产行为影响更大。风险偏好对组织和体制异质性棉农低碳生产行为的影响均在1%的水平上显著为正,但合作社棉农的风险感知与低碳生产行为在10%的水平上负相关,风险偏好与风险感知的交互项在10%的水平上正相关;兵团棉农的风险感知对其低碳生产行为无显著负向影响,且不具有调节作用。

关键词: 风险偏好, 风险感知, 低碳生产行为, 棉农, 新疆

Abstract: Improving risk management and guiding farmers' low‑carbon production is the key to promote the green and low‑carbon transformation of agriculture. Based on the survey data of 289 cotton farmers in Xinjiang, this paper used the Ordered Probit model to empirically analyze the impact of risk preference and risk perception on low carbon production behavior of cotton farmers from the perspective of risk and heterogeneity of low carbon production technology. The research found that: The average low carbon production behavior of the sample cotton farmers was 5.443, which was at the medium adoption level. Risk preference had a significant positive impact on low carbon production behavior of cotton farmers at the level of 1%, risk perception had a significant negative impact on low carbon production behavior of cotton farmers at the level of 1%, and played a significant negative regulatory role between risk preference and low carbon production behavior. The roles of risk preference and risk perception in heterogeneous cotton farmers were quite different. Risk preference had a greater impact on the number of low‑carbon technologies adopted by cotton farmers with high education and high planting experience, and risk perception had a greater impact on the low‑carbon production behavior of cotton farmers with low education, low planting experience and non‑part‑time cotton farmers. The impact of risk preference on low carbon production behavior of cotton farmers with organizational and institutional heterogeneity was significantly positive at the level of 1%, but the risk perception of cooperative cotton farmers was negatively correlated with low carbon production behavior at the level of 10%, and the interaction item of risk preference and risk perception was positively correlated at the level of 10%. The XPCC cotton farmers' risk perception had no significant negative impact on their low‑carbon production behavior, and also had no regulatory effect. 

Key words: risk preference, risk perception, low carbon production behavior, cotton farmers, Xinjiang

中图分类号: